you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 72 points 2 months ago (6 children)

in what world are 1 and 3 fighting each other?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I honestly think you take the bordering states of 1 and 3, and give them to 2. And the rest form a united 1.

    Basically, putting 2 between a hammer and an anvil

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    New Mexico, Colorado, Maryland, and New Jersy are not about to join the neo-confederacy. Maybe Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania if the new POTUS is a black gay trans woman from Michigan who promises to ban chikd marriage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Utah joins and there are constant skirmishes in the rural Colorado regions that are sympathetic until CA puts Utah under control

    Honestly Utah, Wyoming, Montana, both Dakotas, Idaho, and the eastern parts of WA and OR

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Hardly anyone lives in those areas though. And the cities in those states are still really blue/left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    I mean that's the case in nearly every state. Cities mostly lean blue, rural areas red

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Yeah but Wyoming has like half a million people in total, the Denver metropolitan area has over 3 million alone, and plenty of the rural places are blue or not red anyway.

    They’d have no chance if the left took up arms at equal rates (I know, it’s a dangerous assumption). It’s also why our congressional representation is so fucked up.

  • source
  • parent