this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
45 points (92.5% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3124 readers
385 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't follow using Porsche as an example. What iconic model name are they re-using on vehicles that don't match its image?

Did they create a 911 SUV or a G3 station wagon?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Porsche IS the brand. It's customers thought the Macan would tarnish the brand. But in reality they needed the Macan to keep making other models. Same situation as Lambo, Aston, Lotus and soon to be McClaren.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I can't wait for a McLaren SUV.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't buy into the "we HAD TO in order to stay afloat" mantra all of the performance makers are using to justify SUVs. It's a lie. They sell tons of cars at absurd prices. What they meant was "Investors said we had to because there was more money to be made."