you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

It doesn't make sense. But they should be in the EU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (9 children)

    Definitely not. None of the countries currently having candidate status belong into the EU. They are all economically weak countries which would end up getting more money out of the EU than they would pay into it. The finances of the EU are already strained, we can't afford giving out even more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    obviously in a euro-nationalist board the question of climate catastrophe ends up on a discussion where to expand the empire next.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    No. It's a dysfunctional union, where everyone needs to play games because of local politics. But everyone wants to join, because it's still better than being anywhere else. So the expansions are not only voluntarily, but people almost beg to get in. Central power is symbolic.

    Iit's not empireish in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    yeah, everyone like the brits… and remember the various referendums that were held, iirc they were never near 70%.

    reg. yr definition of empire: we're not in that simple galaxy far far away

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Textbook definition really. Where is your galaxy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments