you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 months ago* (16 children)

Georgia is a not an EU member. Ukraine and Moldova too. Why is it presented as such in the picture?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    You might recall that those are candidate countries..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    Well so is Turkey and all the Balkan countries and yet they are excluded

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Wikipedia

    Negotiations with Turkey were opened in October 2005,[2] but have been effectively frozen by the EU since December 2016,[3][4][5] due to backsliding in the areas of democracy, rule of law, and fundamental rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    This is not a revocation of the candidate status. And doesn't answer Balkan exclusion. And if candidates are included, why are EEA/EFTA/Schengen countries excluded? This map makes zero sense.

    EFIT: Just realized its adriatic sea not balkans, my bad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    It doesn't make sense. But they should be in the EU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (9 children)

    Definitely not. None of the countries currently having candidate status belong into the EU. They are all economically weak countries which would end up getting more money out of the EU than they would pay into it. The finances of the EU are already strained, we can't afford giving out even more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    obviously in a euro-nationalist board the question of climate catastrophe ends up on a discussion where to expand the empire next.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    No. It's a dysfunctional union, where everyone needs to play games because of local politics. But everyone wants to join, because it's still better than being anywhere else. So the expansions are not only voluntarily, but people almost beg to get in. Central power is symbolic.

    Iit's not empireish in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    yeah, everyone like the brits… and remember the various referendums that were held, iirc they were never near 70%.

    reg. yr definition of empire: we're not in that simple galaxy far far away

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Textbook definition really. Where is your galaxy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments