▲ 695 ▼ The Mullvad founder gave millions to extremist far right party (mastodon.social) submitted 3 months ago by e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de to c/privacy@lemmy.world 367 comments fedilink hide all child comments The IT company Mullvad’s founder Daniel Berntsson is behind a giant donation to the populist Örebro Party, which advocates “comprehensive re-immigration” from Sweden. “It’s sad that it’s needed,” he told Flamman. ~ https://www.flamman.se/techprofil-ger-miljoner-till-orebropartiet/
[+] Maroon@lemmy.world 248 points 3 months ago (72 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 72 child comments replies: [–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 96 points 3 months ago (22 children) also thought mullvad was legit. also want to know if there's any alternative permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] artifex@piefed.social 49 points 3 months ago (1 child) I’ve semi-seriously been thinking about bootstrapping a VPN service just to have one “not an asshole” service (and that’s setting the bar low - I’m definitely an asshole, just not that kind of asshole). But I’m also a US citizen living in the US, so not the best choice for the job either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Nomad@infosec.pub 13 points 3 months ago JAVS - just another VPN service, let's fucking go. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 months ago If you build it, they will come permalink fedilink source parent [–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago (9 children) I've been using IVPN. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago (1 child) I originally stopped using IVPN because of slow speeds. Has that improved? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 8 points 3 months ago Hey, No. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scytale@piefed.zip 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children) Are you able to get through geo-restrictions on streaming services with IVPN? They have fewer servers than Mullvad it seems. Like for Singapore, they have 2, Mullvad has 5. In Japan, they have 1, while Mullvad has 9. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (4 children) Number of servers is less relevant than users per server. Mullvad is a much bigger company so I'd expect them to need more servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 3 months ago (3 children) It is, when you want to evade geo-restrictions. More servers spread over different IP blocks means there’s more chances the streaming services aren’t aware of some of those IPs yet, so they aren’t blocking them yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children) I'll preface this by saying I used to work in the industry. The restriction evading isn't really related to the number of servers. VPN companies for streaming block evasions buy IP addresses that aren't data centre specific. Those ranges are well known and easily blocked. So for example when you browse you'll generally use a "standard" IP but while connected to the same endpoint if you fire up a netflix session it'll route that traffic out the "streaming" IP. This is also partly to try to prevent steaming companies from getting easy access to a list of those IPs It's quite expensive to get IPs that aren't blocked by steaming services so that is a cheaper cost per user for larger companies. Where I was that cost was way more than the cost of any individual server per month (and some of those servers were hefty). That is one way that Mullvad would have an edge but it's minor. For what it's worth I did have a call with the iVPN lads (twice I think) and found them lovely. Never interacted with Mullvad but I will never give them money after reading this. Weirdly I'm in the market for a new subscription and they would have been my go to. Their fiver a month thing is really very smart. Edit: for geo blocks on standard browsing it would generally present to us as a support ticket. We'd raise it with engineering and they'd assign a new outgoing IP with whoever our provider was. We used M247 a lot and they were very responsive when that happened. Usually a few hours and it was sorted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Thanks for the info, I learned something new. So if for example I run my tv through my VPN and I’m watching youtube. When I switch to the netflix app, the VPN service determines that I’m trying to hit a netflix IP, so it routes it out to an outgoing IP specifically for netflix geo-blocking evasion that is separate from what youtube was using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kobra@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* Its been a couple of years but I didn't have much luck with IVPN and mlb.tv but that was really the only one I tried at the time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago (7 children) Proton VPN have had one of their chefs praising donald trump, but that's the worst I have heard about them. Swiss based (they have among the most protective privacy laws out there), email servers are deep down in the mountains (I don't know about the VON ones), no logs (for what I remember, maybe short lived ones?), made by the dudes at CERN. So compared to others quite flawless IMO. Only technical problem I have had is the VPN switches port from time to time and you have to rebind the network interface of your favourite torrent if you're running a tight ship. I have found no simple way of detecting when it happens. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (6 children) If you're using qbt and gluetun https://gitlab.com/jopiermeier/gluetun-qbittorrent-port-manager permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (5 children) Interesting! So it pings some entity and they send back your external port? I speed read the code (but I'm on mobile) and that's what it looks like. Any information greatly appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments load more comments (5 replies) load more comments (1 reply) [–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 months ago Fuck me, this is gonna ruin mullvad, I hope. Never saw it coming though, wtf? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 months ago (15 children) Can we stop with the "proton" supports trump. This has been echoing since the tweet. I understand the initial recoil, I had it myself, but proton as an entity very clearly does not support trump. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 57 points 3 months ago (9 children) By that logic, Mullvad is fine too, because the entity doesn't support the far right. You are just sending your money to the company which pays the people that do... so... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 months ago (7 children) I mean I'm okay expanding that logic here as well for consistency. This is all on a spectrum, one of Mullvad's top employees donates millions to far right politician is on the more extreme end of that spectrum than a tweet that failed to read the room. Taking your counterpoint even further, if you found out some low level employees at any company used a portion of their paycheck to support far right politics would you boycott? Obviously not, which should show you that you don't believe this should be a binary decision. To be clear, I feel mullvad crossed the line here, my point was that the proton hate doesn't compare and is overblown. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments load more comments (7 replies) [–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 9 points 3 months ago* Uh no? Show me where proton donated millions of dollars to fascists. Their CEO made an unbelievably stupid statement, and then walked it back, but they have not materially supported actual Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Innerworld@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (2 children) https://medium.com/@ovenplayer/does-proton-really-support-trump-a-deeper-analysis-and-surprising-findings-aed4fee4305e permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Really good article, definitely worth reading permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago Proton's VPN is sketchy anyway and JS crypto isn't revolutionary... Or even a good idea really. See tuta and torrent freak for alternatives permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (20 children) Signal was kickstarted by the CIA, so dissidents in regimes they wanted to topple could communicate securely, but at least that seems genuine. Matrix was an Israeli spy company's invention. Telegram is Russian. Reddit started out as the creation of Aaron Schwartz, but he got demonised and committed suicide. Then it was left to that shit eater spez, who sold his soul to the Epstein crowd making Ghislaine Maxwell a powermod among others, also hosting r/the_donald and bridging Trump's popularity from 4chan into the mainstream. Now he sells everyone's data to Google, while still not paying the manufacturers of that data anything. TrueCrypt got shut down because it was too cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 months ago (7 children) Do you have Signal confused with TOR? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments load more comments (7 replies) [–] phase@lemmy.8th.world 5 points 3 months ago And Veracrypt? permalink fedilink source parent [–] redsand@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago (4 children) Matrix does have fundamental design issues you would expect from cellebrite devs... Simplex, Monero and Whonix are all as cool as veracrypt! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] noodlejetski@piefed.social 25 points 3 months ago (3 children) and the SimpleX creator is a far righter, too https://mstdn.social/@rysiek/114630877715286899 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) You'd think with all the trans programmers out there we would have more tech companies built by leftists... But I suppose the leftists are the ones building the platforms for a pittance while the generationally wealthy right-wingers are the ones paying people to do all that work... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) Doesn't matter as much here. It's open source and has passed two audits. Look at the code. Use different servers if you want. Reimplement the protocol if you can. No really, please somone do it in go or rust. I don't want to learn kotlin 🥲 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Emerald@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children) TrueCrypt got shut down because it was too cool. VeraCrypt exists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies) load more comments (3 replies) [–] whaleross@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (6 children) AirVPN? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago (4 children) Didn't air have a data mining scandal like nord and others? Cryptostorm is legit though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whaleross@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Not as far as I've heard? Any links? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies) load more comments (1 reply) [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Proton doesn't support Trump. Their CEO cherished some judge trump put in, and reddit had a field day with it. It's made by CERN scientists, so I guess their PR is suboptimal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] incompetent@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* Proton doesn't support Trump. Their CEO cherished some judge trump put in, and reddit had a field day with it. You seem to be downplaying his support for Trump and the current Republican Party. And if I remember correctly, when the backlash happened, he doubled down on his support. permalink fedilink source parent [–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago Same here, we're left with AirVPN at that point. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 96 points 3 months ago (22 children) also thought mullvad was legit. also want to know if there's any alternative permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] artifex@piefed.social 49 points 3 months ago (1 child) I’ve semi-seriously been thinking about bootstrapping a VPN service just to have one “not an asshole” service (and that’s setting the bar low - I’m definitely an asshole, just not that kind of asshole). But I’m also a US citizen living in the US, so not the best choice for the job either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Nomad@infosec.pub 13 points 3 months ago JAVS - just another VPN service, let's fucking go. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 months ago If you build it, they will come permalink fedilink source parent [–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago (9 children) I've been using IVPN. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago (1 child) I originally stopped using IVPN because of slow speeds. Has that improved? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 8 points 3 months ago Hey, No. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scytale@piefed.zip 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children) Are you able to get through geo-restrictions on streaming services with IVPN? They have fewer servers than Mullvad it seems. Like for Singapore, they have 2, Mullvad has 5. In Japan, they have 1, while Mullvad has 9. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (4 children) Number of servers is less relevant than users per server. Mullvad is a much bigger company so I'd expect them to need more servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 3 months ago (3 children) It is, when you want to evade geo-restrictions. More servers spread over different IP blocks means there’s more chances the streaming services aren’t aware of some of those IPs yet, so they aren’t blocking them yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children) I'll preface this by saying I used to work in the industry. The restriction evading isn't really related to the number of servers. VPN companies for streaming block evasions buy IP addresses that aren't data centre specific. Those ranges are well known and easily blocked. So for example when you browse you'll generally use a "standard" IP but while connected to the same endpoint if you fire up a netflix session it'll route that traffic out the "streaming" IP. This is also partly to try to prevent steaming companies from getting easy access to a list of those IPs It's quite expensive to get IPs that aren't blocked by steaming services so that is a cheaper cost per user for larger companies. Where I was that cost was way more than the cost of any individual server per month (and some of those servers were hefty). That is one way that Mullvad would have an edge but it's minor. For what it's worth I did have a call with the iVPN lads (twice I think) and found them lovely. Never interacted with Mullvad but I will never give them money after reading this. Weirdly I'm in the market for a new subscription and they would have been my go to. Their fiver a month thing is really very smart. Edit: for geo blocks on standard browsing it would generally present to us as a support ticket. We'd raise it with engineering and they'd assign a new outgoing IP with whoever our provider was. We used M247 a lot and they were very responsive when that happened. Usually a few hours and it was sorted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Thanks for the info, I learned something new. So if for example I run my tv through my VPN and I’m watching youtube. When I switch to the netflix app, the VPN service determines that I’m trying to hit a netflix IP, so it routes it out to an outgoing IP specifically for netflix geo-blocking evasion that is separate from what youtube was using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kobra@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* Its been a couple of years but I didn't have much luck with IVPN and mlb.tv but that was really the only one I tried at the time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago (7 children) Proton VPN have had one of their chefs praising donald trump, but that's the worst I have heard about them. Swiss based (they have among the most protective privacy laws out there), email servers are deep down in the mountains (I don't know about the VON ones), no logs (for what I remember, maybe short lived ones?), made by the dudes at CERN. So compared to others quite flawless IMO. Only technical problem I have had is the VPN switches port from time to time and you have to rebind the network interface of your favourite torrent if you're running a tight ship. I have found no simple way of detecting when it happens. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (6 children) If you're using qbt and gluetun https://gitlab.com/jopiermeier/gluetun-qbittorrent-port-manager permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (5 children) Interesting! So it pings some entity and they send back your external port? I speed read the code (but I'm on mobile) and that's what it looks like. Any information greatly appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments load more comments (5 replies) load more comments (1 reply)
[–] artifex@piefed.social 49 points 3 months ago (1 child) I’ve semi-seriously been thinking about bootstrapping a VPN service just to have one “not an asshole” service (and that’s setting the bar low - I’m definitely an asshole, just not that kind of asshole). But I’m also a US citizen living in the US, so not the best choice for the job either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Nomad@infosec.pub 13 points 3 months ago JAVS - just another VPN service, let's fucking go. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 13 points 3 months ago JAVS - just another VPN service, let's fucking go. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 months ago If you build it, they will come permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago (9 children) I've been using IVPN. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago (1 child) I originally stopped using IVPN because of slow speeds. Has that improved? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 8 points 3 months ago Hey, No. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scytale@piefed.zip 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children) Are you able to get through geo-restrictions on streaming services with IVPN? They have fewer servers than Mullvad it seems. Like for Singapore, they have 2, Mullvad has 5. In Japan, they have 1, while Mullvad has 9. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (4 children) Number of servers is less relevant than users per server. Mullvad is a much bigger company so I'd expect them to need more servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 3 months ago (3 children) It is, when you want to evade geo-restrictions. More servers spread over different IP blocks means there’s more chances the streaming services aren’t aware of some of those IPs yet, so they aren’t blocking them yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children) I'll preface this by saying I used to work in the industry. The restriction evading isn't really related to the number of servers. VPN companies for streaming block evasions buy IP addresses that aren't data centre specific. Those ranges are well known and easily blocked. So for example when you browse you'll generally use a "standard" IP but while connected to the same endpoint if you fire up a netflix session it'll route that traffic out the "streaming" IP. This is also partly to try to prevent steaming companies from getting easy access to a list of those IPs It's quite expensive to get IPs that aren't blocked by steaming services so that is a cheaper cost per user for larger companies. Where I was that cost was way more than the cost of any individual server per month (and some of those servers were hefty). That is one way that Mullvad would have an edge but it's minor. For what it's worth I did have a call with the iVPN lads (twice I think) and found them lovely. Never interacted with Mullvad but I will never give them money after reading this. Weirdly I'm in the market for a new subscription and they would have been my go to. Their fiver a month thing is really very smart. Edit: for geo blocks on standard browsing it would generally present to us as a support ticket. We'd raise it with engineering and they'd assign a new outgoing IP with whoever our provider was. We used M247 a lot and they were very responsive when that happened. Usually a few hours and it was sorted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Thanks for the info, I learned something new. So if for example I run my tv through my VPN and I’m watching youtube. When I switch to the netflix app, the VPN service determines that I’m trying to hit a netflix IP, so it routes it out to an outgoing IP specifically for netflix geo-blocking evasion that is separate from what youtube was using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kobra@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* Its been a couple of years but I didn't have much luck with IVPN and mlb.tv but that was really the only one I tried at the time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago (1 child) I originally stopped using IVPN because of slow speeds. Has that improved? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 8 points 3 months ago Hey, No. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children) Are you able to get through geo-restrictions on streaming services with IVPN? They have fewer servers than Mullvad it seems. Like for Singapore, they have 2, Mullvad has 5. In Japan, they have 1, while Mullvad has 9. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (4 children) Number of servers is less relevant than users per server. Mullvad is a much bigger company so I'd expect them to need more servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 3 months ago (3 children) It is, when you want to evade geo-restrictions. More servers spread over different IP blocks means there’s more chances the streaming services aren’t aware of some of those IPs yet, so they aren’t blocking them yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children) I'll preface this by saying I used to work in the industry. The restriction evading isn't really related to the number of servers. VPN companies for streaming block evasions buy IP addresses that aren't data centre specific. Those ranges are well known and easily blocked. So for example when you browse you'll generally use a "standard" IP but while connected to the same endpoint if you fire up a netflix session it'll route that traffic out the "streaming" IP. This is also partly to try to prevent steaming companies from getting easy access to a list of those IPs It's quite expensive to get IPs that aren't blocked by steaming services so that is a cheaper cost per user for larger companies. Where I was that cost was way more than the cost of any individual server per month (and some of those servers were hefty). That is one way that Mullvad would have an edge but it's minor. For what it's worth I did have a call with the iVPN lads (twice I think) and found them lovely. Never interacted with Mullvad but I will never give them money after reading this. Weirdly I'm in the market for a new subscription and they would have been my go to. Their fiver a month thing is really very smart. Edit: for geo blocks on standard browsing it would generally present to us as a support ticket. We'd raise it with engineering and they'd assign a new outgoing IP with whoever our provider was. We used M247 a lot and they were very responsive when that happened. Usually a few hours and it was sorted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Thanks for the info, I learned something new. So if for example I run my tv through my VPN and I’m watching youtube. When I switch to the netflix app, the VPN service determines that I’m trying to hit a netflix IP, so it routes it out to an outgoing IP specifically for netflix geo-blocking evasion that is separate from what youtube was using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kobra@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* Its been a couple of years but I didn't have much luck with IVPN and mlb.tv but that was really the only one I tried at the time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (4 children) Number of servers is less relevant than users per server. Mullvad is a much bigger company so I'd expect them to need more servers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 3 months ago (3 children) It is, when you want to evade geo-restrictions. More servers spread over different IP blocks means there’s more chances the streaming services aren’t aware of some of those IPs yet, so they aren’t blocking them yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children) I'll preface this by saying I used to work in the industry. The restriction evading isn't really related to the number of servers. VPN companies for streaming block evasions buy IP addresses that aren't data centre specific. Those ranges are well known and easily blocked. So for example when you browse you'll generally use a "standard" IP but while connected to the same endpoint if you fire up a netflix session it'll route that traffic out the "streaming" IP. This is also partly to try to prevent steaming companies from getting easy access to a list of those IPs It's quite expensive to get IPs that aren't blocked by steaming services so that is a cheaper cost per user for larger companies. Where I was that cost was way more than the cost of any individual server per month (and some of those servers were hefty). That is one way that Mullvad would have an edge but it's minor. For what it's worth I did have a call with the iVPN lads (twice I think) and found them lovely. Never interacted with Mullvad but I will never give them money after reading this. Weirdly I'm in the market for a new subscription and they would have been my go to. Their fiver a month thing is really very smart. Edit: for geo blocks on standard browsing it would generally present to us as a support ticket. We'd raise it with engineering and they'd assign a new outgoing IP with whoever our provider was. We used M247 a lot and they were very responsive when that happened. Usually a few hours and it was sorted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Thanks for the info, I learned something new. So if for example I run my tv through my VPN and I’m watching youtube. When I switch to the netflix app, the VPN service determines that I’m trying to hit a netflix IP, so it routes it out to an outgoing IP specifically for netflix geo-blocking evasion that is separate from what youtube was using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 3 months ago (3 children) It is, when you want to evade geo-restrictions. More servers spread over different IP blocks means there’s more chances the streaming services aren’t aware of some of those IPs yet, so they aren’t blocking them yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children) I'll preface this by saying I used to work in the industry. The restriction evading isn't really related to the number of servers. VPN companies for streaming block evasions buy IP addresses that aren't data centre specific. Those ranges are well known and easily blocked. So for example when you browse you'll generally use a "standard" IP but while connected to the same endpoint if you fire up a netflix session it'll route that traffic out the "streaming" IP. This is also partly to try to prevent steaming companies from getting easy access to a list of those IPs It's quite expensive to get IPs that aren't blocked by steaming services so that is a cheaper cost per user for larger companies. Where I was that cost was way more than the cost of any individual server per month (and some of those servers were hefty). That is one way that Mullvad would have an edge but it's minor. For what it's worth I did have a call with the iVPN lads (twice I think) and found them lovely. Never interacted with Mullvad but I will never give them money after reading this. Weirdly I'm in the market for a new subscription and they would have been my go to. Their fiver a month thing is really very smart. Edit: for geo blocks on standard browsing it would generally present to us as a support ticket. We'd raise it with engineering and they'd assign a new outgoing IP with whoever our provider was. We used M247 a lot and they were very responsive when that happened. Usually a few hours and it was sorted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Thanks for the info, I learned something new. So if for example I run my tv through my VPN and I’m watching youtube. When I switch to the netflix app, the VPN service determines that I’m trying to hit a netflix IP, so it routes it out to an outgoing IP specifically for netflix geo-blocking evasion that is separate from what youtube was using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children) I'll preface this by saying I used to work in the industry. The restriction evading isn't really related to the number of servers. VPN companies for streaming block evasions buy IP addresses that aren't data centre specific. Those ranges are well known and easily blocked. So for example when you browse you'll generally use a "standard" IP but while connected to the same endpoint if you fire up a netflix session it'll route that traffic out the "streaming" IP. This is also partly to try to prevent steaming companies from getting easy access to a list of those IPs It's quite expensive to get IPs that aren't blocked by steaming services so that is a cheaper cost per user for larger companies. Where I was that cost was way more than the cost of any individual server per month (and some of those servers were hefty). That is one way that Mullvad would have an edge but it's minor. For what it's worth I did have a call with the iVPN lads (twice I think) and found them lovely. Never interacted with Mullvad but I will never give them money after reading this. Weirdly I'm in the market for a new subscription and they would have been my go to. Their fiver a month thing is really very smart. Edit: for geo blocks on standard browsing it would generally present to us as a support ticket. We'd raise it with engineering and they'd assign a new outgoing IP with whoever our provider was. We used M247 a lot and they were very responsive when that happened. Usually a few hours and it was sorted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Thanks for the info, I learned something new. So if for example I run my tv through my VPN and I’m watching youtube. When I switch to the netflix app, the VPN service determines that I’m trying to hit a netflix IP, so it routes it out to an outgoing IP specifically for netflix geo-blocking evasion that is separate from what youtube was using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Thanks for the info, I learned something new. So if for example I run my tv through my VPN and I’m watching youtube. When I switch to the netflix app, the VPN service determines that I’m trying to hit a netflix IP, so it routes it out to an outgoing IP specifically for netflix geo-blocking evasion that is separate from what youtube was using? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago Yeah that's exactly it. That's how we did it anyway. I guess other providers may have their own secret sauce but I have to assume it's some variation of that. We paid for a pool of, I think, 1000 non-contiguous residential / business IPs and if any of them got blocked we just immediately rotated. Honestly we never had much trouble with it after the initial engineering work was done. I don't think the providers really give a shit beyond best initial effort to make the rights holders happy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kobra@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* Its been a couple of years but I didn't have much luck with IVPN and mlb.tv but that was really the only one I tried at the time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago (7 children) Proton VPN have had one of their chefs praising donald trump, but that's the worst I have heard about them. Swiss based (they have among the most protective privacy laws out there), email servers are deep down in the mountains (I don't know about the VON ones), no logs (for what I remember, maybe short lived ones?), made by the dudes at CERN. So compared to others quite flawless IMO. Only technical problem I have had is the VPN switches port from time to time and you have to rebind the network interface of your favourite torrent if you're running a tight ship. I have found no simple way of detecting when it happens. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (6 children) If you're using qbt and gluetun https://gitlab.com/jopiermeier/gluetun-qbittorrent-port-manager permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (5 children) Interesting! So it pings some entity and they send back your external port? I speed read the code (but I'm on mobile) and that's what it looks like. Any information greatly appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (6 children) If you're using qbt and gluetun https://gitlab.com/jopiermeier/gluetun-qbittorrent-port-manager permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (5 children) Interesting! So it pings some entity and they send back your external port? I speed read the code (but I'm on mobile) and that's what it looks like. Any information greatly appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (5 children) Interesting! So it pings some entity and they send back your external port? I speed read the code (but I'm on mobile) and that's what it looks like. Any information greatly appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 months ago Fuck me, this is gonna ruin mullvad, I hope. Never saw it coming though, wtf? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 months ago (15 children) Can we stop with the "proton" supports trump. This has been echoing since the tweet. I understand the initial recoil, I had it myself, but proton as an entity very clearly does not support trump. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 57 points 3 months ago (9 children) By that logic, Mullvad is fine too, because the entity doesn't support the far right. You are just sending your money to the company which pays the people that do... so... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 months ago (7 children) I mean I'm okay expanding that logic here as well for consistency. This is all on a spectrum, one of Mullvad's top employees donates millions to far right politician is on the more extreme end of that spectrum than a tweet that failed to read the room. Taking your counterpoint even further, if you found out some low level employees at any company used a portion of their paycheck to support far right politics would you boycott? Obviously not, which should show you that you don't believe this should be a binary decision. To be clear, I feel mullvad crossed the line here, my point was that the proton hate doesn't compare and is overblown. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments load more comments (7 replies) [–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 9 points 3 months ago* Uh no? Show me where proton donated millions of dollars to fascists. Their CEO made an unbelievably stupid statement, and then walked it back, but they have not materially supported actual Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Innerworld@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (2 children) https://medium.com/@ovenplayer/does-proton-really-support-trump-a-deeper-analysis-and-surprising-findings-aed4fee4305e permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Really good article, definitely worth reading permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago Proton's VPN is sketchy anyway and JS crypto isn't revolutionary... Or even a good idea really. See tuta and torrent freak for alternatives permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 57 points 3 months ago (9 children) By that logic, Mullvad is fine too, because the entity doesn't support the far right. You are just sending your money to the company which pays the people that do... so... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 months ago (7 children) I mean I'm okay expanding that logic here as well for consistency. This is all on a spectrum, one of Mullvad's top employees donates millions to far right politician is on the more extreme end of that spectrum than a tweet that failed to read the room. Taking your counterpoint even further, if you found out some low level employees at any company used a portion of their paycheck to support far right politics would you boycott? Obviously not, which should show you that you don't believe this should be a binary decision. To be clear, I feel mullvad crossed the line here, my point was that the proton hate doesn't compare and is overblown. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments load more comments (7 replies) [–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 9 points 3 months ago* Uh no? Show me where proton donated millions of dollars to fascists. Their CEO made an unbelievably stupid statement, and then walked it back, but they have not materially supported actual Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 months ago (7 children) I mean I'm okay expanding that logic here as well for consistency. This is all on a spectrum, one of Mullvad's top employees donates millions to far right politician is on the more extreme end of that spectrum than a tweet that failed to read the room. Taking your counterpoint even further, if you found out some low level employees at any company used a portion of their paycheck to support far right politics would you boycott? Obviously not, which should show you that you don't believe this should be a binary decision. To be clear, I feel mullvad crossed the line here, my point was that the proton hate doesn't compare and is overblown. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 9 points 3 months ago* Uh no? Show me where proton donated millions of dollars to fascists. Their CEO made an unbelievably stupid statement, and then walked it back, but they have not materially supported actual Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Innerworld@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (2 children) https://medium.com/@ovenplayer/does-proton-really-support-trump-a-deeper-analysis-and-surprising-findings-aed4fee4305e permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Really good article, definitely worth reading permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Really good article, definitely worth reading permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago Proton's VPN is sketchy anyway and JS crypto isn't revolutionary... Or even a good idea really. See tuta and torrent freak for alternatives permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (20 children) Signal was kickstarted by the CIA, so dissidents in regimes they wanted to topple could communicate securely, but at least that seems genuine. Matrix was an Israeli spy company's invention. Telegram is Russian. Reddit started out as the creation of Aaron Schwartz, but he got demonised and committed suicide. Then it was left to that shit eater spez, who sold his soul to the Epstein crowd making Ghislaine Maxwell a powermod among others, also hosting r/the_donald and bridging Trump's popularity from 4chan into the mainstream. Now he sells everyone's data to Google, while still not paying the manufacturers of that data anything. TrueCrypt got shut down because it was too cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 months ago (7 children) Do you have Signal confused with TOR? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments load more comments (7 replies) [–] phase@lemmy.8th.world 5 points 3 months ago And Veracrypt? permalink fedilink source parent [–] redsand@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago (4 children) Matrix does have fundamental design issues you would expect from cellebrite devs... Simplex, Monero and Whonix are all as cool as veracrypt! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] noodlejetski@piefed.social 25 points 3 months ago (3 children) and the SimpleX creator is a far righter, too https://mstdn.social/@rysiek/114630877715286899 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) You'd think with all the trans programmers out there we would have more tech companies built by leftists... But I suppose the leftists are the ones building the platforms for a pittance while the generationally wealthy right-wingers are the ones paying people to do all that work... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) Doesn't matter as much here. It's open source and has passed two audits. Look at the code. Use different servers if you want. Reimplement the protocol if you can. No really, please somone do it in go or rust. I don't want to learn kotlin 🥲 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Emerald@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children) TrueCrypt got shut down because it was too cool. VeraCrypt exists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies) load more comments (3 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 months ago (7 children) Do you have Signal confused with TOR? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments load more comments (7 replies)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago (4 children) Matrix does have fundamental design issues you would expect from cellebrite devs... Simplex, Monero and Whonix are all as cool as veracrypt! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] noodlejetski@piefed.social 25 points 3 months ago (3 children) and the SimpleX creator is a far righter, too https://mstdn.social/@rysiek/114630877715286899 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) You'd think with all the trans programmers out there we would have more tech companies built by leftists... But I suppose the leftists are the ones building the platforms for a pittance while the generationally wealthy right-wingers are the ones paying people to do all that work... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) Doesn't matter as much here. It's open source and has passed two audits. Look at the code. Use different servers if you want. Reimplement the protocol if you can. No really, please somone do it in go or rust. I don't want to learn kotlin 🥲 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] noodlejetski@piefed.social 25 points 3 months ago (3 children) and the SimpleX creator is a far righter, too https://mstdn.social/@rysiek/114630877715286899 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) You'd think with all the trans programmers out there we would have more tech companies built by leftists... But I suppose the leftists are the ones building the platforms for a pittance while the generationally wealthy right-wingers are the ones paying people to do all that work... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) Doesn't matter as much here. It's open source and has passed two audits. Look at the code. Use different servers if you want. Reimplement the protocol if you can. No really, please somone do it in go or rust. I don't want to learn kotlin 🥲 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) You'd think with all the trans programmers out there we would have more tech companies built by leftists... But I suppose the leftists are the ones building the platforms for a pittance while the generationally wealthy right-wingers are the ones paying people to do all that work... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) Doesn't matter as much here. It's open source and has passed two audits. Look at the code. Use different servers if you want. Reimplement the protocol if you can. No really, please somone do it in go or rust. I don't want to learn kotlin 🥲 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children) TrueCrypt got shut down because it was too cool. VeraCrypt exists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (6 children) AirVPN? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago (4 children) Didn't air have a data mining scandal like nord and others? Cryptostorm is legit though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whaleross@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Not as far as I've heard? Any links? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies) load more comments (1 reply)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago (4 children) Didn't air have a data mining scandal like nord and others? Cryptostorm is legit though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whaleross@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Not as far as I've heard? Any links? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children) Not as far as I've heard? Any links? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Proton doesn't support Trump. Their CEO cherished some judge trump put in, and reddit had a field day with it. It's made by CERN scientists, so I guess their PR is suboptimal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] incompetent@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* Proton doesn't support Trump. Their CEO cherished some judge trump put in, and reddit had a field day with it. You seem to be downplaying his support for Trump and the current Republican Party. And if I remember correctly, when the backlash happened, he doubled down on his support. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] incompetent@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* Proton doesn't support Trump. Their CEO cherished some judge trump put in, and reddit had a field day with it. You seem to be downplaying his support for Trump and the current Republican Party. And if I remember correctly, when the backlash happened, he doubled down on his support. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago Same here, we're left with AirVPN at that point. permalink fedilink source parent