you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

A full pardon? Maybe for some of them, especially the zine guy, but the guy who actually shot the cop, unlikely. No democrat would want the optics of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Cop shot first. The guy who shot him did so in community defense.

    In fact that cop may have given the shooter's attorneys an argument to revisit Harlow v Fitzgerald, and hand the SCOTUS the full text of §1983. They were given, unknowingly, an illegally edited text in 1982 when Harlow v Fitzgerald established Qualified Immunity, which is illegal according to the full statute as recorded in the 1871 Congressional Record.

  • source
  • parent