I only read his collapse of antiquity, whose insight is similar to what Parenti said about Rome during the times of Julius Caesar and the civil war between the popularis and optimates. I know nothing else about Hudson other than he is transphobic pos.

While there are things to criticize Hudson for, his advocacy of modern monetary theory for example, labelling him a "bourgeois economist" seems dishonest. He's a self described "Marxist economist" and similar to his colleague Richard Wolff, he unfortunately has some western Marxist brainworms, likely made worse by existing within trotskyist circles in his formative years. He most importantly takes an anti-imperialist stance and this is reflected throughout his work.