34

The UK parliament's Westminster Hall saw a highly unusual debate on Monday evening on a petition to "call a public inquiry into pro-Israel influence on politics & democracy".

The petition, which received more than 118,000 signatures from members of the public, said: "We are concerned about reported Israeli state-linked and pro-Israel lobbying activity in UK politics. We believe it is important to determine the scope and impact of any such influence campaigns." Petitions to parliament which receive more than 100,000 signatures are always debated on.

However, this debate consisted mainly of Conservative and Labour MPs who are members of pro-Israel groups saying the petition was antisemitic, while a minority who spoke in favour of it posed detailed questions about lobbying and transparency which went unanswered.


James Frith, a government minister and the parliamentary under-secretary of state for digital government, said that "the government do not support a public inquiry solely on pro-Israeli influence". He further said: "We should condemn the readiness, ease and tendency to hold 300,000 British Jews collectively accountable for the actions of the Israeli government."

At that point, Independent MP Adnan Hussain stood up and said: "Can I ask the minister why so many in this house, including himself, conflate the Jewish faith and Jewish people with the actions of the state of Israel?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

All of it is crazy, but what gets me a little bit most, is that they seemingly think that they can ignore 118,000 signatures with little to no repercussions. That's the head of the snake. A lot more than 118,000 signatures need to be collected and used to a lot more effect than a petition for the two parties to debate. An example of something.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
34 points (97.2% liked)

United Kingdom

6784 readers
388 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS