you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (26 children)

Let's compare two of the richest men in history

Rockefeller's charitable giving began with his first job as a clerk at age 16, when he gave six percent of his earnings to charity, as recorded in his personal ledger. By the time he was twenty, his charity exceeded ten percent of his income.

Vs

Elon Musk and the Musk Foundation have disbursed over $1.1 billion since 2010. However, the vast majority of his recent philanthropy—including a record $474 million in 2024—primarily funded his own personal entities, specifically schools and donor-advised funds closely linked to his business and personal interests

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    Rockefeller recorded it in his own personal ledger?

    I'm sure it was all on the up and up. Just like I paid taxes on all of my tips when I was getting paid cash for waiting tables.

    (A joke, I realize Rockefeller did contribute quite a bit to the common good, at least once he was mind bendingly wealthy.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (24 children)

    what is your point? should elon musk just donate 10% of his wealth and all is well?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago*

    10% is the VAT of food in my country.

    Your average citizen pays more than 10% of their food budget in taxes. This nazi's wealth is bigger than the yearly production of most countries. 10% is nothing.

    EDIT: he's a nazi, not a dude.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    99% of his wealth should be taxed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    We're would the money come from to do this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    No, i mean where does he get the money to pay the taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    He had to liquidate his stocks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    So our 401ks are paying the tax, and in return we get 350p/e speculative stocks that don't turn a profit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    No the fucking system resets its all fake anyway. Fuck elon and these scammers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Then what? Everyone loses their retirement?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    They do when the bubble pops anyway. They do when billionaires and now a trillionaire crashes the system and puts us all into another recession so they can buy up everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    But how would elon buy anything when 99% of his wealth is stocks that crashed?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You know that is still an absolute fuck ton of money right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (6 children)

    I'm not saying Rockefeller is the benchmark, but being a historically rich man (600bn in today's money) he is a benchmark. One which Musk is not meeting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    a benchmark in what way? you should just not be able to be that rich. he isn't a benchmark, he didn't work for his own money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I've just compared Musk to Rockefeller. He's a benchmark whether you like it or not.

    you should just not be able to be that rich

    That's a problem for society. Nothing to do with benchmarking.

    he didn't work for his own money

    No capitalist does. Even people earning interest on their 401k.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    This much wealth concentrated into one person is very wrong. Wealth leads to power and no one person should have that much power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Sure. But that doesn't mean you can't compare musk to Rockefeller or use him as a benchmark.

    Using someone as a known benchmark doesn't mean they were good or bad, just that they're an established quantity. Rockefeller was wealthy beyond normal levels of wealth. It makes sense to use him as a comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Totally agree. But that's the corporate sponsored capitalism that the US has voted for.

    Karl Marx predicted that free-market competition would inevitably result in monopolies and the concentration of massive productive forces under a single capitalist.

  • source
  • parent