1267
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1267 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
86613 readers
3487 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
laughs in Firefox/Librewolf
No worries, play store-recaptcha is coming for you too!
?
affects mobile the most obviously... but google's playbook is to basically have forced telemetry always and enforce integrity of their telemetry, and by extension advertising etc.
https://piunikaweb.com/2026/05/07/google-recaptcha-play-services-requirement/ - this just seems like an ok article for it, I did a simple web search and it came up, but others certainly exist if you dislike the source.
Looking forward to when they remove the old options & force PC users to scan reCAPTCHA QRs:
Those sites will be dead to me :)
QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.
On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).
I still won't actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.
Thats new. Thank you for the tip. Installed!
How do the rewrites work? Is it like Redirector?
Would be awesome if I could just import my Redirector regex json file
After doing that, do you have an option to select which application you want to run (browser, video player etc?)
I use Open Link With, but would love to be able to edit the URL before.
Edit: From the description I think it might do that. This is neat, thanks for the recommendation.
...just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.
Unfortunately, we're fighting an uphill battle here.
We'd need government regulation "protecting privacy", instead they seem all too eager to concede that in a futile effort to " protect the children ".
At which point they cease to be your favourites, I hope. There are so many alternatives in that space that only inertia keeps people using the Empire of Evil.
I doubt SearXNG is going to integrate it lmao, and if they do, someone will fork or i will keep using older versions
Searching is already dead. Every search results in 200 Ai articles full of bullshit, even Qwant or DuckDuckGo.
The corpo-web died already, y'all are just crying over the scraps.
kagi at least tries to remove ai slop and gives you the means to report it.
You're forgetting other countries that will just stop using American tech companies
How are people without phones expected to pass the captcha?
WTF? I don't think I will use any sure that will enable this?
How does that prevent bots? Ther are massive phone farms, that can't scan QR?
This only exists so they can link identity of your phone with your desktop computer.
Waiting for another player....
PRESS START TO JOIN
Zen is excellent.
For people who want an opinionated browser... Yes. They have sponsored shortcuts which cannot be disabled and they ghost out the option to in the settings. If you want to dig around the about:config and tweak things, fine, but I'd rather use a browser I can make my own. Librewolf is excellently bare bones.
I haven't seen any of those things yet, but I'll try to keep an eye out. The only one I noticed was a default search engine to Google, but DDG was an easy enough option. I like libre wolf as well, but I'm not a fan of the updating scheme on my system.
Sponsored shortcuts? They don't have them, i did a clean install only some week ago so i doubt it's a new thing
Never seen those, and did a fresh install recently too. And zen has a lot of customization options, it's also so damn well designed and is great to use.
Corpo banned it for compatibility with crap code apparently
The MV3 support in firefox is even stricter than in Chrome. I found that chrome will let you sidestep CSP to make an HTTP request. Firefox won't.
I don't understand what you found, but firefox still supports the web request blocking API for Mv3 extensions, which is what ublock needs.
I was debugging one of my favourite extensions this week to figure out why it didn't work on firefox. It hadn't been updated in years, so something changed in firefox in the last few months.
I assume the Chrome version still works. I'm not installing it.
if it hadn't been updated in years then it will be an Mv2 extension, irrelevant to discussion of Mv3 strictness.
It was MV3. I had to rewrite the manifest as V2 to get it working.
FF support is getting worse and worse though.
Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.
Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.
Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.
Fun fact: many sites that say that they don't support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox "less secure" or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work
(Not all sites ofc)
I think you should read my reply again, slowly
I'm not talking about sites that claim not to support FF. I'm talking about sites that have broken features when visited in FF.
Do you have any example? Can you send any link? I never experienced those problems myself so i want to try
Chrome is doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by not following web standards. There are several websites I have used where the payment process or uploading process only worked in chrome.
Again, this is a problem with chrome doing things that breaks consistency between browsers that are supposed to be following the same web standards.
This should be seriously addressed tbh, someone should make an european initiative to sanction whoever don't follow web standards; I'd make it but i am not really the right person to do it, sadly
This is very well documented, and a very common experience.
They were talking about exactly this on late night linux podcast just last week.
That isn't FF support. That is chrome doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by implementing non-standard functionality to abuse their market dominance.
Sure but if devs don't test sites in Firefox then very they don't support Firefox.
why would those sites support ladybird if they don't support firefox?
Wait, what sites don't work in firefox?
Yet to see one.
I've answered this so many times.
Banks, my uni, accounting software I use at work.
Its a well acknowledged and much discussed fact that the web is buggy with ff.
Wack. Its usually chrome that shits the bed. Or its because their app cant tolerate an adblocker.
Doesn't match up with my lived experience. Sorry for your loss.