5
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Astrealix@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I dunno. Stats are stats, felt like we were attacking more and with more threat than them watching the game

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

I watched a different game, the one I watched matched those stats.

[-] Astrealix@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, agree to disagree. I felt like they were basically horseshoe of dooming us lol

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

At the end, especially in extra time, that was definitely the case. And, it's true that they didn't manage many real attacks. OTOH Arsenal couldn't break out of that horseshoe either. The XG graphs suggest that even though they weren't getting a lot of high quality chances, they were getting enough low quality chances continuously throughout the game that a breakthrough eventually was expected. Meanwhile, Havertz scored on an extremely low XG chance. That was Arsenal's only shot on target all game. There was also one miss, and 5 blocked shots. That's it for 120 minutes, and includes the attempts from set pieces too.

120 minutes and 1 shot on target is pretty poor.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)

Gunners

1639 readers
11 users here now

Victoria Concordia Crescit

We are a community for supporters of the North London-based football club Arsenal F.C.

Sister Community: https://lemmy.world/c/arsenalwfc

Join our FPL with League Code: tt2t8e

If old posts remain pinned on other instances, comment on the Daily Discussion with a screenshot!

Transfer Reliability Guide

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS