397

Henry Cuellar, Donald Davis, Cleo Fields, Laura Gillen, Vicente Gonzalez, Marcy Kaptur, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Eugene Vindman

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago

Because most people know what a rhetorical question is?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Maybe you should look it up then. Because, if you answer it for them, it's not really rhetorical, is it?

[-] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 17 hours ago

I think you missed the part where I framed it as if I was having a conversation with the person? You're clearly angry about my choice of literary devices. Sorry to upset you.

Have a nice day.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It's not a literary device, though, is the problem.

Also, as long as we're talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as "angry" is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course.

[-] zoloftt@lemmy.world -2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I hope one day you'll be to actually comprehend that.

[-] zoloftt@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

Me too, thanks!

this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
397 points (98.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

4645 readers
475 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS