678
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
678 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
85080 readers
3954 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Him alone supporting or not supporting Twitch means absolutely nothing for Twitch, but quite a bit for his viewership. Just moving one creator off the biggest platform accomplishes nothing.
And I don't see a universe where Big Tech is going to change its' tune either unfortunately.
Basically every podcast is available on Spotify and Apple Podcasts, some of the major ones also on YouTube. How's that different from streaming?
And I'm saying there's no point unless it's a coordinated effort. A single creator being unavailable on Twitch changes nothing, except that single streamer's visibility. It would have to be a ton of people streaming outside of the mainstream platforms for people to forget about Twitch.
Aye, but even games they DO have, they sell less than Steam, despite offering a technically superior product (DRM-free).
Their website runs fine on Firefox on Linux and you can use any number of utilities to run games with Proton and manage prefixes, such as Bottles, umu, etc. Heroic even provides a unifying launcher for GOG and a few other windows-only stores. Are you saying the convenience of the more proprietary platform is keeping you from using the less proprietary one? You can see how it's the same for 99% of humanity and corporate streaming services, right? The competing service needs to win on multiple points to overcome the convenience and familiarity of the existing.
We've already discussed several times precisely how it does. If you don't agree, that's fine, but you can stop repeating the same nonsense over and over.
Not as long as people like you continue to advocate against it.
Because they're also available without them. And YouTube does not have podcasts.
Brother you can't just start at 5 million. Everything starts at one. Fortunately there are already hundreds, but none of them as influential as the mayor of NYC.
I don't care about their website. I want a client where I click a button and the game launches.
It only works like 10% of the time. While Steam works 99%. Even when it works it doesn't support a bunch of features that GOG desktop does.
No I'm saying one supports free operating systems and the other doesn't.
Okay, tell me how many people are going to stop using Twitch because one single streamer streams elsewhere?
Yes, I'm the reason big tech wants to make more money, not because they like making money.
Yes, and this stream is also available on platforms that are not Twitch. Similarly to how everyone still gets their podcasts off Spotify or Apple Podcasts because those have all the podcasts, everyone will still stream on Twitch if all their other content is still on Twitch too.
Sure, YouTube doesn't have podcasts.
And which app or website can you go to to see all of those hundreds in one place?
So you want convenience and it's worth more to you than your game being DRM-free. This is literally why every game dev still sells on Steam instead of delisting and going exclusively to GOG and itch. And it's why nobody who streams will take their stream off Twitch. Because of people like you, who want the convenience of going on Twitch and just clicking.
You don't NEED any features other than "launch game". Some apps I can suggest for this: Konsole, alacritty, cosmic-term
But GOG supports free operating systems. The client is completely optional and it came several years after the website which supports every modern browser and OS. Not supporting free operating systems is an imaginary issue you're making up to justify NOT LEAVING THE CONVENIENT CORPORATE PLATFORM THAT HAS ALL YOUR CONTENT IN ONE PLACE. If you really cared, you could also run the GOG client with Wine just like you run the games themselves.
It doesn't matter how many times you ask this leading question, I'm not repeating myself. Scroll up. This conversation is never going to make sense to you if you're unable to understand the simple concept of a transition.
No, people like you are the reason they will continue making money. People who actively advocate against alternatives.
Only if they elect to multistream them to those platforms. Every other platform he's streaming it to is ALSO Big Tech. Podcasts are distributed via an open protocol called RSS and you can listen to them however you want, without any platforms involved at all.
Can you link me to the RSS feed for these "podcasts"? No? Then they're not podcasts.
Once again, already discussed above. If you're just not going to read my responses, I'm going to stop writing them.
It doesn't matter if its DRM-free or not if it DOESN'T WORK.
These are not "apps", they are terminal emulators, and they obviously don't solve the problem I'm describing.
I would to hear how you describe this. They have zero Linux software whatsoever. And they don't support Proton, even though they absolutely could.
That's very obviously would simply not work.
I'm not advocating against alternatives, I'm saying there's no point in dropping your visibility to zero if there's not at least a semi-viable alternative to unify under.
You're just being obtuse on purpose.
Nearly nobody uses RSS readers these days, people get their podcasts on other apps. The RSS feed isn't a defining feature of podcasts anymore and many of the biggest podcasts no longer use it. Out of the ones I linked, the smallest (and by far the best) one, Cortex, still has an official RSS Feed. Now show me a podcast with significant followership that does not host their content on Spotify, Apple or YouTube and is only available via the RSS feed.
What doesn't? Most GOG games seem to work just fine on Linux. Heroic Launcher? Idk, I don't use it much, it's unnecessary for GOG anyway, it's only really necessary for Epic which doesn't have download links on the website (I suppose you COULD also curl the games, but that requires more setup than most people would want to do, with cookies and everything)
Open terminal,
umu-run ~/games/some_game/some_game.exe. You can even use tab to auto complete parts of the path.Done. Game's running, faster than any big GUI launcher opens, whether it be Steam, or GOG Galaxy.
Why's that? It's literally how I played Assassin's Creed, except it was uplay rather than GOG Galaxy.
When you say that, that's exactly what you're doing. And it is not true, either.
What do you mean "other apps"? Every podcast app is an "RSS reader". How do you think people listen to Spotify podcasts from the Apple podcasts app, and vise versa? You should really educate yourself more on how this works. You do not have to upload your podcast to Apple to be visible on Apple.
It is quite literally the only defining feature, other than containing audio/video media.
Then they're not podcasts.
Where they're hosted is not relevant. Every podcast with an RSS feed is available on Apple and Spotify apps. 100.0000% of them. Along with any and every other podcast app.
GOG games on Linux.
LOL this is a gross oversimplification and you know it. Its not that simple and it WILL NOT WORK. I'm not playing this game anymore.