467
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

Or am I mistaken?

Yes

Yeah, I’ve heard about that, but right now China is second in terms of billionaires after the US.

Yes because China has a very large population and thus all absolute numbers not adjusting for this will be extremely large and out of step with reality. In reality the rate of billionaires in China is 0.288 (Between India and Kazakhstan while being far less poor and far more advanced) where as it is 2.42 in the US and 0.821 in Russia for example.

[-] Sedan@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 hours ago

Yes, I agree with you. But that doesn't change the essence of Ma and the others.

[-] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago

It does. Ma and other capitalists having no political power is absolutely a change in essence of their position

this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
467 points (99.2% liked)

Socialism

6775 readers
168 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS