▲ 516 ▼ TIL that eating dirt was common in the U.S. South until the 80s. People ate a handful a day, often seasoned with vinegar and salt. (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 months ago* by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/til@lemmy.world 211 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://www.nytimes.com/1984/02/13/us/southern-practice-of-eating-dirt-shows-signs-of-waning.html
[–] The_v@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago (1 child) The most likely explanation is that kaolinite clay is known to reduce nausea and diarrhea. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.893831/full permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (2 children) I compost and a common practice is to throw a handful of your native soil into your pile when you start it, to inoculate it with local soil bacteria. Bacteria do most of the work in an active compost pile. I wonder if people were getting some kind of gut flora benefit from this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Depending on the composition of the soil it might also have antiparasitic properties. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sydd@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Or they could be beneficial parasites, like that episode of the space show. permalink fedilink source parent [–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) I wonder this exact thing, given that soil is a living organism full of beneficial bacteria and other organic materials. The food we eat consumes it, takes what it needs, and then we do the same. I find it also interesting that while the article claims this is a cultural thing vs. being done for heath benefits, I’d argue it became cultural because of a universal understanding of health benefits. Now I’m not saying this is some long lost concept that is the missing key to fix all our ills, however I can see how consuming soil was an integral part of maintaining gut health and boosting immunity way before we understood how those systems work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Yeah I don’t see an answer, but it is possible that it is chemical and not about flora, because I keep seeing “clay” mentioned specifically, instead of “soil.” I agree that just saying “it’s cultural” is not an explanation. Cultures are not entirely arbitrary. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (2 children) I compost and a common practice is to throw a handful of your native soil into your pile when you start it, to inoculate it with local soil bacteria. Bacteria do most of the work in an active compost pile. I wonder if people were getting some kind of gut flora benefit from this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Depending on the composition of the soil it might also have antiparasitic properties. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sydd@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Or they could be beneficial parasites, like that episode of the space show. permalink fedilink source parent [–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) I wonder this exact thing, given that soil is a living organism full of beneficial bacteria and other organic materials. The food we eat consumes it, takes what it needs, and then we do the same. I find it also interesting that while the article claims this is a cultural thing vs. being done for heath benefits, I’d argue it became cultural because of a universal understanding of health benefits. Now I’m not saying this is some long lost concept that is the missing key to fix all our ills, however I can see how consuming soil was an integral part of maintaining gut health and boosting immunity way before we understood how those systems work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Yeah I don’t see an answer, but it is possible that it is chemical and not about flora, because I keep seeing “clay” mentioned specifically, instead of “soil.” I agree that just saying “it’s cultural” is not an explanation. Cultures are not entirely arbitrary. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Depending on the composition of the soil it might also have antiparasitic properties. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sydd@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Or they could be beneficial parasites, like that episode of the space show. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sydd@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago Or they could be beneficial parasites, like that episode of the space show. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 months ago (1 child) I wonder this exact thing, given that soil is a living organism full of beneficial bacteria and other organic materials. The food we eat consumes it, takes what it needs, and then we do the same. I find it also interesting that while the article claims this is a cultural thing vs. being done for heath benefits, I’d argue it became cultural because of a universal understanding of health benefits. Now I’m not saying this is some long lost concept that is the missing key to fix all our ills, however I can see how consuming soil was an integral part of maintaining gut health and boosting immunity way before we understood how those systems work. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Yeah I don’t see an answer, but it is possible that it is chemical and not about flora, because I keep seeing “clay” mentioned specifically, instead of “soil.” I agree that just saying “it’s cultural” is not an explanation. Cultures are not entirely arbitrary. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Yeah I don’t see an answer, but it is possible that it is chemical and not about flora, because I keep seeing “clay” mentioned specifically, instead of “soil.” I agree that just saying “it’s cultural” is not an explanation. Cultures are not entirely arbitrary. permalink fedilink source parent