you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It is very much not clearly indicative of that. It has 1/10th of the reviews because it is expected to be relevant to far fewer people than Saros. The audience tends to value games that they've had marketed to them, which is a correlation for what should be obvious reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    They sold a similar amount, your agument only works if saros sold a proportional amount more (10x in this case). As it stands the marketing clearly did not work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    The studio's previous game, which is very similar on a gameplay level, sold over 1M copies. Saros costs $10 more than Returnal cost and almost twice as much as Xenonauts 2. Beyond that, Returnal was a difficult game, and trophy data shows lots of people didn't get anywhere close to finishing it; distaste for the previous game and a slightly higher price for what is, by Sony's standards, less production value than you can find in other PS5 games at $70, are far better explainers for Saros' performance.

  • source
  • parent