you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 4 months ago (7 children)

it's probably really cheap and reliable to build it that way? that's what i always assume when i hear "dumb" design for some products

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    It's required for how revolver weapons operate. You cannot have the cylinder floating at all as even a few mm of difference can result in catastrophic failure. People saying revolvers are more "reliable" are full of fucking shit. The damn things are like clocks with their own set of springs and similar to operate.

    It was true that early semi-autos were unreliable in keeping from going off suddenly with a round chamber and hammer back. That was early ones though, not today's. While it's not 100%, it's still much safer than a revolver with the hammer back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Didn't sig make a Turning Point USA edition of one of their guns not too long ago?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments