659
Me_irl (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Of course it would be! Fossil fuels are cheap and easy to extract. Energy consumption is directly correlated to quality of life. You think if there were fewer people they would just say "no thanks, we've had enough material wealth, just leave the cheap and easy energy in the ground, we're good"

What in our history makes you think our resource usage is related to population? You said it yourself that most of the world is living in poverty and needs to increase their resource consumption to get to a decent quality of life. That's clearly one of the things that would have happened with fewer people. The other would be whatever mega yachts would be if the rich were 4x richer..... Maybe space yachts.....

This anti-natalism thing you've got going is really rotting your mind.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
659 points (99.5% liked)

me_irl

7611 readers
2758 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS