Scromit (thelemmy.club)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 38 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Oh you can relax, this is 100% propaganda. The bots are going to light me up for this, but it’s just not a real documented thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] -29 points 3 months ago (2 children)
    • 11 month old account
    • Exactly 1 comment

    Hmm very suspicious

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Ah, yes, attack the person, ignore the data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Can you explain how that’s an attack? Isn’t that just normal pointing out bots? And don’t just lazily spam an ad hominem link, since bots don’t have persons to attack

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Attacking a human person and accusing an account of being a bot are completely separate things

    This is a lazy argument on your part. I disagree with your evaluation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    An account is an inanimate thing... you can't accuse it of anything.

    You are accusing the person controlling the account of running a bot (which you have zero proof for except vibes) instead of addressing their argument.

    That's as classic ad-hominem as it gets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Agree to disagree. I only engage with humans, not clankers. Think of it as a CAPTCHA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Raises hand meekly... I do in fact get this if I've been consistent for a long-ass time, not necessarily the dose size, but I swear to god you could replace my pen with ipecac and it would be the same experience. That said, long breaks "reset" it for me.

    And while I don't personally know anyone with the same problem, there are thousands of stories both online and IRL for me of "friend of a friend can't smoke weed anymore because of it".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    I'm super curious now... Are you screaming while vomiting? And this is a different urge than what you feel for a "normal" vomit? Like there is a compulsion to scream while you're doing it?

    Edit: hmmm, no reply. I think this person may have scromitted themselves to death

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    If the consistency doesn't take dosage into consideration does it take frequency? I'm curious about that part. I only partake 1 time a week (generally) but I do that every week so my consistency is high.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago* (6 children)

    Its extremely well documented. This is exactly why you shouldnt take medical advice online seriously. It just stems from an over saturation of cannaboid receptors. The same receptors whose antiemetic effects are useful for cancer patients or other nausea prone patients can be reversed by over saturation of the receptor. It can be fixed typically by a period of abstinence that lets the receptors reset, but some people can never really partake again.

    I say this as someone who worked as a nursing assistant and used to be an anatomy/biology tutor in college. I also have smoked way more weed than any of you over the past decade. If you havent seen any evidence of this, its because you have no idea how to look.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    estimated 32% prevalence among cannabis users

    113 cases documented worldwide

    never heard of it despite your social circle being mostly daily smokers of high-thc weed

    Lol definitely not a propaganda thing, and all of us 339 pot smokers should be worried

  • source
  • parent