▲ 305 ▼ Scromit (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/memes@sopuli.xyz 146 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 months ago (1 child) Ah, yes, attack the person, ignore the data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child) Can you explain how that’s an attack? Isn’t that just normal pointing out bots? And don’t just lazily spam an ad hominem link, since bots don’t have persons to attack permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago (1 child) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -7 points 3 months ago (1 child) Attacking a human person and accusing an account of being a bot are completely separate things This is a lazy argument on your part. I disagree with your evaluation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (1 child) An account is an inanimate thing... you can't accuse it of anything. You are accusing the person controlling the account of running a bot (which you have zero proof for except vibes) instead of addressing their argument. That's as classic ad-hominem as it gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -9 points 3 months ago (1 child) Agree to disagree. I only engage with humans, not clankers. Think of it as a CAPTCHA permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Dude, they provided like 7 reputable sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago You can lead a horse to water… permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child) Can you explain how that’s an attack? Isn’t that just normal pointing out bots? And don’t just lazily spam an ad hominem link, since bots don’t have persons to attack permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago (1 child) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -7 points 3 months ago (1 child) Attacking a human person and accusing an account of being a bot are completely separate things This is a lazy argument on your part. I disagree with your evaluation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (1 child) An account is an inanimate thing... you can't accuse it of anything. You are accusing the person controlling the account of running a bot (which you have zero proof for except vibes) instead of addressing their argument. That's as classic ad-hominem as it gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -9 points 3 months ago (1 child) Agree to disagree. I only engage with humans, not clankers. Think of it as a CAPTCHA permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Dude, they provided like 7 reputable sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago You can lead a horse to water… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago (1 child) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -7 points 3 months ago (1 child) Attacking a human person and accusing an account of being a bot are completely separate things This is a lazy argument on your part. I disagree with your evaluation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (1 child) An account is an inanimate thing... you can't accuse it of anything. You are accusing the person controlling the account of running a bot (which you have zero proof for except vibes) instead of addressing their argument. That's as classic ad-hominem as it gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -9 points 3 months ago (1 child) Agree to disagree. I only engage with humans, not clankers. Think of it as a CAPTCHA permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Dude, they provided like 7 reputable sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago You can lead a horse to water… permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -7 points 3 months ago (1 child) Attacking a human person and accusing an account of being a bot are completely separate things This is a lazy argument on your part. I disagree with your evaluation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (1 child) An account is an inanimate thing... you can't accuse it of anything. You are accusing the person controlling the account of running a bot (which you have zero proof for except vibes) instead of addressing their argument. That's as classic ad-hominem as it gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -9 points 3 months ago (1 child) Agree to disagree. I only engage with humans, not clankers. Think of it as a CAPTCHA permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Dude, they provided like 7 reputable sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago You can lead a horse to water… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (1 child) An account is an inanimate thing... you can't accuse it of anything. You are accusing the person controlling the account of running a bot (which you have zero proof for except vibes) instead of addressing their argument. That's as classic ad-hominem as it gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -9 points 3 months ago (1 child) Agree to disagree. I only engage with humans, not clankers. Think of it as a CAPTCHA permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Dude, they provided like 7 reputable sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago You can lead a horse to water… permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world -9 points 3 months ago (1 child) Agree to disagree. I only engage with humans, not clankers. Think of it as a CAPTCHA permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Dude, they provided like 7 reputable sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago You can lead a horse to water… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Dude, they provided like 7 reputable sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago You can lead a horse to water… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago You can lead a horse to water… permalink fedilink source parent