35

just in general id like to see some communist perspective on it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pyromaiden@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 4 weeks ago

This is actually a valid point with a historical precedent.

Notice how nearly nobody is genuinely advocating for the return of feudalism. It's dead in the water, its few defenders so inconsequential that they're politically impotent. Same for monarchism. The bourgeois revolution succeeded at killing those ideas entirely and as such there's no real reason to suppress ideologies calling for their return.

Capitalism and liberalism will join them under a communist society. Isolated groups of nobodies who don't understand history will call for their return, but there will be no actual weight behind their calls. No action will follow and any movements they develop will stagnant or wither and die.

[-] LeninZedong@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 4 weeks ago

There are fringe (and very strange) people that do support the return to monarchy, and their clearly absurd stance can be seen with two pieces of information:

  1. They fail to understand that monarchies do not make decisions separate from the class relations of their day, as well as the fact that they do not hold "absolute power".
  2. They seem like a bunch of armchairists (without even the theoretical backing that some lazy Marxists have) that are too lazy to restore monarchism, so they just end up supporting conservatism while having a weird obsession with a remnant of feudalism in their minds.
[-] KalergiPlanner@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 4 weeks ago

For a socialist educated populace, the idea of bringing back capitalism sounds ridiculous. It's why the revisionists had to boil the frog to bring about capitalist restoration in socialist countries, and this was possible because there are capitalist elements within socialism as socialism emerges from capitalism.

Under communism, even the most clever revisionists can't do anything to revive the corpse of capitalism because it's just straight up dead on a world scale and the capitalist elements are all but gone.

[-] Maeve@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago

Hi, can you please explain to me what you see as differences between socialism and communism? Thanks.

[-] KalergiPlanner@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Socialism: what comes after a successful proletarian revolution; proletarian dictatorship, a proletarian controlled state; the big bourgeoisie has been liquidated but other classes might still exist within the society as proletarianization is an ongoing process.

Communism: what comes after socialism has developed to a high stage world-wide; stateless, classless, and moneyless society; the working classes have been merged into one class, the bourgeoisie worldwide has been liquidated.

[-] Maeve@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago

Thank you so much. I wasn't sure if you were using it in this manner or some Western laissez - faire , nebulous sense many in the West use it.

this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
35 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1333 readers
149 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS