57
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Clem talks about that in the comments. What are some no hassle, Debian based, rustless distros as alternative to Mint?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In fact, for reasons I don’t quite understand many of these rust rewrites are licensed with the MIT license.

I think it's pretty obvious. Corpos are doing the EEE approach in the Linux ecosystem.

[-] brandon@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, the 'for reasons I don't quite understand' bit was intended slightly sarcastically.

[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

It's bad that we're in an all-time low percentage of politically minded Linux users, in another era Rust would never be close to the Linux kernel or would pose as a threat to GNU/GPL.

[-] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

Why is Rust your problem here? It’s a fantastic language. The issue is licensing

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

The language isn’t the problem. It’s the particular type of programmer it attracts.

[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's the tool used to enshitification of Linux, that's my problem. Tech and politics are indivisible. We're on lemmy.ml so that should be a no-brainer.

Also, technically, it's not very stable and there's no alternative for the compiler.

[-] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Rust is the only reason I’m remotely interested in low level programming and potentially contributing to Linux. C and C++ are unreadable and vastly more confusing in terms of ecosystem to be worth dealing with for my own enjoyment. I don’t really understand the rust hate.

[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The reason was pretty well stated already.

If your contribution were MIT licensed, some would rather you hadn't written a single line of ecosystem destroying code.

[-] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Others would say it’s open source who gaf what happens with it, the codes probably already in the training data for llms anyway. Depends on your philosophy of open source. I’d rather have gpl than mit, but I’d rather use rust than c I guess so such is my opinion

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Hrmmm. And I wonder what diagnosis you have or should be tested for…

[-] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ah yes a programming language determines the mental state and acuity of the person using it. This might be the dumbest thing I’ve ever read in my entire life. Are you sure you aren’t the one we need to test with such ludicrous ideas?

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Not what I meant. The Rust language appeals a particular type of neuro type especially. And with that neurotype, there comes some specific design behaviours.

[-] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There’s a “neurotype”… associated with liking a programming language? Are you some kind of nazi or something?

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

As for Nazi, quite the opposite. If I were one, I would insensitively had just spelled it out and have people yell. This is observation and also spoken about by one in the community who wrote the book I mention in another response.

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Look up Steve Klabnik and his book The Rust Programming Language. He goes into details about who the language appeals to and why, and he is not wrong.

[-] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Ah yes the programmer who knows lots about psychology with his PhD or PsyD wrote a book about something that makes no sense in this context (the use of the word neurotype unless that’s your doing) must surely know what he’s talking about. As everyone knows if you write a book then it’s true. Seems like you’re just using the book as a convenient way to prop up your bias and stereotypes. Truly I suggest some introspection on the things you’re saying. I’ll bet you have some image of what I look like in your mind and it’d probably be absolutely shattered were you to know what I do look like. Maybe go and actually meet some people who happen to like rust and realize that not everybody whose likes one programming language or another makes it their whole personality. This is like saying someone who prefers using hammers and nails over screws and screwdrivers has a different neurotype. Genuinely weird commentary from you.

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Deny it all you want, but you should get tested. :)

this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
57 points (91.3% liked)

Linux

65343 readers
442 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS