70
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
70 points (94.9% liked)
news
934 readers
785 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
Congress applauding this is such a great little microcosm. You know whose job it is to make sure those checks and balanced get enforced? So don't applaud like you're the audience at a show you play no part in, like you're a crowd at a concert making your support for the matter heard because its all you can do. If you like checks and balances so much, you may have to actually do your job rather than just looking brave long enough for your campaign team to clip the c-span footage into a tiktok
Exactly.
For the last ~40 years, Congress has abdicated it's JOB.
Congress is supposed to be doing the things the president now does, because then they don't have to take the heat and can get reelected.
500 criminals (ok, one or two may not be)
The checks and balances is based on who is in the office performing the particular check and/or balance, and in most cases by far it is the Republicans themselves who are in the position of doing the checks and balances, because the US constitution is so naive and antiquated that it doesn't consider partisanship, but assumes that everyone would consider their office first and political affiliation last.
So no, they can't do those checks and balances because they are not in a position to do so.