I see it everywhere online. YouTube, forums, Discord, etc. Doesn't matter. Chuds often start frothing at the mouth and post whatever buzzwords they think win the "argument" (it's an argument the same way a child whines their parents won't buy them a toy at the store is an "argument").

Not to mention, some people are so wrong it would take months of educating them to get a baseline where they can actually discuss the topic with you. Their lack of reading comprehension doesn't help. Example: the Destiny vs. Finkelstein "debate." Except that's every discussion everywhere online with liberals and reactionaries.

Holy shit, this is reminding me of this moment that lives rent-free in my head where I typed a whole-ass comment on Reddit explaining why "anti-white racism" is not a thing, and, in said comment, I specifically mentioned that acts of anti-white prejudice do happen, but such do not entail systemic harm and cannot be considered racism.

Despite this, some bozo responded to me by retelling this moment when some Black teenagers moved into their neighborhood and called them things like "whitey" and "cracker" as their sole "evidence" against my entire comment, thinking that we are automatically granting that anti-white prejudice "counts" as racism.

They basically are so caught-up in that semantic trap of believing that anti-white prejudice must be denoted a form of "racism" that they legitimately believed that my point was to argue that anti-white prejudice does not exist rather than arguing that it does exist but it is not "racism," despite my comment unequivocally saying otherwise.

That’s how you know it’s a human and not an LLM. LLM bots typically respond to the last thing you said or try to address everything point by point (but miss a few)

Blessed be illiteracy, it’s how you know you speak to a human in 2026