German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul called for eliminating the European Union's unanimous vote principle in the areas of foreign and security policy and replacing it with the majority vote principle seen in democracies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 15 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Sounds like a bad idea. Maybe something like 90% instead of 100%? That still prevents solo vetoes like hungary but doesnt make it so easy to completely destroy the EU from the inside.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    As far as I understand it, an idea proposed by many is qualified majority voting where a decision can be made by 55% of member states with 65% of EU population. Didn't read the article yet so I don't know if there was something else mentioned.

    Found this source for further information on how qualified majority voting works: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/how-does-the-council-vote/qualified-majority/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 5 months ago* (2 children)

    unanimous

    This means complete agreement by all members of a vote. So if they werent actually talking about 100% then they just misused the word unanimous.

    A quick search of the query "EU unanimous" gave me this. There are a lot of EU bodies that work in various ways so it can get confusing.

    https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/how-does-the-council-vote/unanimity/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments