Yeah, I'm probably one of the most skeptical individual regarding Kurdistan, however Türkiye is unquestionably the instigator of the whole issue. Kurds would not be able to be used like disparate playthings of empire if Türkiye wasn't ruthlessly vile against them. Part of the reason no settlememt could made in Syria between Assad and Rojava was in my opinion because the Syrian government feared that too many concessions would lead to Türkiye directly invading the country.

I'd argue Türkiye isn't quite at the same level as the zionists, but more so because at the very least they are still an organic part of the region (even if their state is ethnosupremacist) rather than explicitly settler colonial.

The current Turkish initiative to basically recreate the influence of the ottoman empire in the modern setting is obviously a danger to every other country in the region as well. I suspect that one Israel collapses, which I think will be sometime after the resumption of the war against Iran, Türkiye and Iran's cordial relationship is going to be strained. I expect to see some synchronization of the Islamic Republic with the Safavids coming put of Türkiye as it ramps up in the coming decades.

I still hold the opinion though that outside of Türkiye, Kurdistan is not project that can succeed as an anti-imperialist entity. Also the region largely needs to reject ethnoreligious seperatism in favor of unified efforts against imperialism and towards economic development.