crime is a spook
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 5 months ago (36 children)
  • [+] 4 points 5 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] -3 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    if you're going to just make things up, you should start off by letting everyone know so tehy don't waste their time on your storytelling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (8 children)

    So you are unable to specify exactly what was fabricated.

    At least you should be able to provide evidence against the things I said.

    I mean, it's not like ancient Mesopotamia had accounting practices 7000 years ago or anything.

    I'm sure there are plenty of examples of currency and hierarchy free societies with populations in the tens to hundreds of millions you could provide.

    I'd also be interested to see what your plan is to peacefully change the governmental structure for 8 billion people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    We've never entirely eliminated money or government at a large scale to test the hypothesis if we would just make these concepts again. So it is entirely made up to say we would just invent them again because you can't prove we would. Admittedly, its nearly impossible to test in the real world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It's impossible to do in the real world because doing so would violate the core tenants of anarchy. You'd have to conquer the world to get things to change within our lifetime.

    For the record, I'm all for anarchy. I just don't think it's achievable due to human nature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    Thats the conundrum. Our ideological morals says it has to be the people's choice, you cannot conquer them and force it. But tbh I dont think a nation has tried it (mostly because no nations want to desolve themselves). Closest we have in modern day is the Zapatistas iirc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    So you are unable to specify exactly what was fabricated.

    i did. every line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    That's not being specific. Words have meaning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    you're sealioning now. you know you made all that up because you don't have a credible source for any of it. go play games somewhere else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (22 children)
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (21 children)

    your gif broke. but i foundi t, and it's just an appeal to ridicule, not evidence for your claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (20 children)

    i thought you were making a joke (one i liked, too) that i said people create things. no worries, it's hard to communicate tone over text.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (19 children)

    straight up mott and bailey. retreat from your specific, unjustified claim to one very broad and easy to defend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (18 children)

    sorry, but you're committing the fallacy fallacy and i don't debate people who do that bullshit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I don't want debate. I want you to stop making things up and spreading them as fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    you're committing the fallacy fallacy

    wrong, but you just did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    let us spout the names of fallacies instead of talking, that is productive. that's you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (12 children)

    another appeal to ridicule, but no evidence that money or government are inevitabilities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 5 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    i explicitly said i don't want a debate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (9 children)

    yet you keep demanding i provide logic and evidence. what is that but demanding a debate? do you really think everyone here is that stupid?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    i am not demanding anything. i'm pointing out that you literally made up your claim, and rather than even try to support it, you play rhetorical games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Fine you don't want to have a debate or have people challenge your opinions. You only want to tell others that their opinions are objectively wrong and everyone else except for you and your chosen few are idiots. My dude, what you're doing isn't new, I've been seeing it on the internet for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    that's how speech works. people make up what they say. do you shout that at everyone?

    edit: wait, do you only communicate in quotes? Is that what you were expecting?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    that’s how speech works. people make up what they say.

    when making claims about the natural world, doing that is worse than just keeping your mouth shut.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    shame you wouldn't recognize when you're talking to an expert, since they have information and experience that contradicts your keyboard warrior lifestyle. but go off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    an unsupported appeal to authority.

    if you were an expert you wouldn't have made the erroneous claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments