619
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rothe@piefed.social 61 points 6 days ago

Fuck her. Don't forget all the hateful shit she has spouted up until she splintered from Trump, trying to start her own faction of the hateful fascists.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is short sighted.

You can hate someone and still agree when they say something you agree with. If you dismiss a point just because of who said it, you’re showing you don’t actually care whether the point is true.”

If you just hate someone cause "oh they're on the other side from me" does that really make you better than the other side who does the same?

Edit: this seems to be setting a lot of people off, I consider myself a fairly logical person. If you can explain to me, in good faith and with a calm disposition, why should I think differently, I will listen.

[-] Cherries@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

It depends. If they are an obvious grifter like MTG, hell yes I'm better than her. She has shown no contrition, no growth, no regret for the horrible policies she's pushed forth. This is not a person who wants to genuinely make the country a better place, she's a piece of shit who senses a better deal elsewhere.

This is like seeing a person willing to cheat with you and thinking, "I should start a genuine relationship with this person; they would surely never cheat on me."

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Okay let's remove the "are we better than her" part, do you think that her stance here is entirely null and void because of the person she is? Would you change your mind if Bernie said it?

I'm not saying you have to start a relationship with her or start pioneering her cause, but if you're going to discount a point you might agree with because of the person, what's the point of making policies in the first place? We might as well hit full send and send politics to where I see it going, just put the candidates on a tinder like app with no more than a tweet of what they're about, have them put on a red or blue tie and be done with it. No need for nuance, just vote based on looks, hell, we don't even need the blurbs at the bottom.

[-] Cherries@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

You do not, under any circumstance, gotta hand it to Hitler. The nuance here is that MTG is a piece of shit. We must be intolerant of the intolerant because welcoming them and accepting them society provides an opening for them to spread their anti social beliefs. Before they are welcomed into polite society, they must show that they have changed and are compatible with polite society.

It is ok to have disagreements with others, so long as the disagreements aren't something like, "we disagree if gay people should be allowed to get married". People who hold such anti social beliefs must not be allowed a foothold. People like MTG use the more sane policies as cover to infiltrate and spread their actual beliefs, like Jewish Space Lasers.

You are too focused on the trees to notice that the forest is garbage. The nuance here is not that MTG has some good takes. The nuance here is that MTG will say and do anything to advance her anti social agenda.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

My man, if I'm focused on the trees you're sitting there staring at a leaf. I feel like I've been pretty on point about what I'm trying to say here. You can agree with something someone you hate said. If you can't, you're letting emotions take over logic

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

If you can’t, you’re letting emotions take over logic

MTG is a politician, not a logician, and people’s responses to her bigoted ass don’t have to be restrained to pure logic.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

All you control in this life is your own response to stimuli, MTG isn't making you be illogical, you are.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago
[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

I appreciate it but Im also highly aware that nobody is going to be changing their mind in this discussion. I just hate to see a smart place like Lemmy devolve into what I would call "dumb politics"

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Too late, I just got here admittedly but it has been not what I would call intelligent. Better than Reddit. Like hepatitis is better than aids

We are not led, we are disunited, the enemy is organized. Until that changes we lose.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Well said brother

[-] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 6 days ago

Well, Hitler wanted every German to do sports and be fit and was against smoking. He was a monster but in those things he was on the right side.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Okay let’s remove the “are we better than her” part, do you think that her stance here is entirely null and void because of the person she is?

Yes, actually. 100% I think that.

Do you not understand the fact that a grifter or opportunist saying something makes it completely meaningless?

Like, hell, do you look at stuff like JD Vance saying "If you want your kid to go and fight in some stupid globalist war, vote for Joe Biden" and not understand that he's completely full of shit?

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

I understand that you think that, but I have a feeling I'm less emotionally invested in this than you

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Lmao what? 😂

Secret cheat code to win any argument: just say the other person is being emotional.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

Who's trying to win? I assumed we were just debating

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

And you think calling people emotional contributes to debate?

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

I said you seemed emotionally invested compared to me, you took it personally

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

No, actually, I didn't. I think it says a lot more about you than me that your go-to tactic in debates is to accuse the other person of being emotional, based off nothing, as if it were disqualifying.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

Seems like you're getting kinda emotional about this.

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol -1 points 6 days ago

Who's doing that?

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

She created this problem, and she's pretending to be some voice of reason now that it suits her ambitions. She's welcome to change sides - that's her prerogative - but nobody owes her respect or forgiveness. She has been legitimately heinous and bares massive responsibility for the suffering the world is going through today. She wants redemption and welcome into a position of respect among reasonable people after blaming wildfires on Jewish space lasers and working against climate action. She's not entitled to a leadership position in the fight against Trump and I refuse to acknowledge her.

If she's going to go back to pulling maga bullshit because people remember things she said and did and hold her to account for it? Then she was never worth having as an ally in the first place.

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 6 days ago

If you just hate someone cause “oh they’re on the other side from me” does that really make you better than the other side who does the same?

When the other side are discount nazis, yes it does make me better than them.

[-] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

You can also hate someone and just give no fucks whether they are right or wrong or are in agreement with. That bitch should get cancelled already. I dunno what PR firm she hired, but they must be worth it.

If you just hate someone cause "oh they're on the other side from me" does that really make you better than the other side who does the same?

No. OP clearly stated because 'all the hateful shit she has said.'

I've seen piles of shit that are better than MTG. And occasionally I wasn't looking I stepped in a pile of it.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

Let me ask this, if she said "hitler is bad" do you write that off or agree with it? Of course this is a fictional, absurd example. But this is the best way I can just lay out my argument with an example.

I believe you should be able to take a statement like "trump is insane" and agree with it, without getting hung up on who said it, regardless of them being a piece of shit.

But I also understand these are intense times, and maybe everyone doesn't separate the voice from the speaker like I do.

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

“On the other side from me”? Oh please, she is a transphobic piece of shit whose “side” wants me dead or worse. I do not give a shit what she says. She is not, has never been, and never will be a leftist just because she said some mean shit about trump once.

[-] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Whose talking about switching sides? Sir or madam, i keep repeating this point. You can acknowledge you agree with something someone said even if you hate them. If you can't, you're prioritizing thinking emotionally instead of logically

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

You are also going to lose if you reject allies, with your enemies whispering whom to reject.

Israel is the devil, and the ledt lets them play us like a fiddle. Off of each other.

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

‘Allies’ is an interesting word choice considering what an over the top anti-queer bigot MTG is.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago
[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Fuck all to do with whether the American politician this post is about is a piece of shit.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Idk your point. Israel is the linchpin in all of this. They are the keystone of fascism. Also the ones with blackmail on all of our politicians, business leaders, academic douchebags in the ivy league, and so forth. They are the key to all of this, and Epstein is the key to razing and burning the oligarchy.

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Israel didn’t make MAGA and fascism has existed in America since before the modern state of Israel even existed. You should really read something like Lies My Teacher Told Me if you’re unfamiliar with that aspect of American history and believe it needed outside interference to manifest here.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Yet the current situation all stems from 1971, the business roundtable, and they have been hand in glove with Israel. You are right, it's a lot bigger than Israel, but you might be surprised just how much the two are connected, how the billionaires running this show are involved in both spheres in many cases.

Israel for instance has since before most of us were born sending advisers to our police departments for instance. But lately, things have taken a darker turn. The forces of fascism were nurtured and reared in Israel and being brough back over here, the imperial boomerang.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

You're assuming she's genuine, when her entire history warns against making that assumption. If she wants to prove her worth, she can leave the Republican party, declare herself an independent, and caucus with the Democrats.

She won't, because it's all a grift and she's hoping to con all the people who are ok with looking the other way at child rape, but not at rising oil prices.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

If she wants to prove her worth, she can leave the Republican party, declare herself an independent, and caucus with the Democrats.

How about, if she wants to prove her worth, she can retire from politics forever, give all she has to the poor, and spend her weekends volunteering at soup kitchens.

I'm not opposed to forgiveness or giving people second chances, unless that second chance means putting them in a leadership role after they've already fucked up in such a role. At that point, it's just failing to hold powerful people accountable. Are there not enough people in the country to find someone who doesn't have a track record like hers?

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Oh I'm right there with you. She's completely untrustworthy.

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I assume that she's seen how Trump supporters treat Republicans who dare to contradict their Dear Leader, and she simply decided that she'd rather step away from Congress and potentially receive fewer death threats. Nobody knows the lengths a cult will go to better than someone who has just escaped.

If I'm being extra generous, I could say maybe she knows what happens to representatives who don't toe the party line, so she stepped down to avoid cuts to her constituents' services. But that might be giving her too much credit.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

I think she is already in a relationship.

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
619 points (98.0% liked)

Political Humor

1979 readers
852 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS