117
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 44 points 1 week ago

So they're literally saying it's a busy box (see image) while simultaneously saying it will replace large swathes of human labor. Deeply unserious.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago

Large swathes of human labor is spent on busy work, because improving society would have untold and unprofitable consequences for the current regime.

[-] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

What I'm getting at is that it's something given to babys to make them feel like they're doing something. In the case of AI, it's sold to CEOs as a way to automate labor, when it really just produces worthless dogshit that appears to be useful to the untrained eye. The busy work should absolutely be automated and people should be freed from drudgery but these planet-destroying toys controlled by corporations are not the way to get there.

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Capitalist apologists will tell you that all of this busywork is economically necessary, critical even.

[-] jack@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

It is necessary to the maximization of profit. Capitalists don't employ all those marketers, salesmen, accountants, HR people, etc. for fun and charity. They do it because capitalism requires massive amounts of socially useless labor to get the maximum sales volume and market dominance.

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Is a certain quantity of this socially useless labor mathematically vital to the survival of capital, or is the proliferation of this labor a sort of unchecked outgrowth that's an unforeseen outcome?

graeber "The answer clearly isn't economic: it's moral and political."

[-] jack@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

"The answer clearly isn't economic: it's moral and political."

that's not at all clear to me

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

It's literally straight out of the article that coined the term "Bullshit Jobs", a point that's made several times

It's not at all clear to me how capitalists are directly compelled to do what they do by macroeconomic forces alone, in such a way that it is not possible to imagine them acting otherwise. That is a far-reaching claim that demands the burden of proof.

[-] JustSo@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

what is this an anarchist diy fidget spinner?

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
117 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24324 readers
269 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS