117
Microsoft says Copilot is for entertainment purposes only, not serious use — firm pushing AI hard to consumers and businesses tells users not to rely on it for important advice (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/technology@hexbear.net
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 44 points 6 months ago (8 children)

So they're literally saying it's a busy box (see image) while simultaneously saying it will replace large swathes of human labor. Deeply unserious.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Large swathes of human labor is spent on busy work, because improving society would have untold and unprofitable consequences for the current regime.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    What I'm getting at is that it's something given to babys to make them feel like they're doing something. In the case of AI, it's sold to CEOs as a way to automate labor, when it really just produces worthless dogshit that appears to be useful to the untrained eye. The busy work should absolutely be automated and people should be freed from drudgery but these planet-destroying toys controlled by corporations are not the way to get there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Capitalist apologists will tell you that all of this busywork is economically necessary, critical even.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    It is necessary to the maximization of profit. Capitalists don't employ all those marketers, salesmen, accountants, HR people, etc. for fun and charity. They do it because capitalism requires massive amounts of socially useless labor to get the maximum sales volume and market dominance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Is a certain quantity of this socially useless labor mathematically vital to the survival of capital, or is the proliferation of this labor a sort of unchecked outgrowth that's an unforeseen outcome?

    graeber "The answer clearly isn't economic: it's moral and political."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    "The answer clearly isn't economic: it's moral and political."

    that's not at all clear to me

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    It's literally straight out of the article that coined the term "Bullshit Jobs", a point that's made several times

    It's not at all clear to me how capitalists are directly compelled to do what they do by macroeconomic forces alone, in such a way that it is not possible to imagine them acting otherwise. That is a far-reaching claim that demands the burden of proof.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent