394
Trump issues warning to 5 Democratic states, says raids already started
(www.newsweek.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
394 points (99.0% liked)
News
37746 readers
1795 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
can't wait to see who wins the "first sitting governor to be arrested by the Trump admin" bet on polymarket.
That thing so much needs to be extremely fucking illegal.
Burning it to the ground would be OK if outlawing it takes too long.
Fucking really? There’s a bet for that? I’m both shocked and sadly not surprised at all. Everything I hear about Polymarket betting is so appalling.
I did not bother to check if it actually exists, I actually don't know if they would allow that specific bet. But, they are ghouls that profit off the exploitation of the powerless so I'm sure they're working on it.
Ok fair enough. I’m choosing blissful* ignorance on this one.
*For a given value of “blissful,” given the shitshow of everything going on.
I find my little joys in my little jokes. I don't know how much it helps, but I do enjoy it.
I couldn't find one. The closest thing would be the running bet on when Tim Walz is being arrested and charged.
Fucking do it, I hope they arrest Pritzker. It'll put him straight to the top of the '28 Dem candidates.
Ew, please don't simp for billionaires
Our great Khan has done wonders for our state finances while constantly passing legislation that benefits the working class, preserves our rights, and protects marginalized communities. All while pushing back against Trump and laying groundwork for Democrats to prosecute this administration in 2029.
He will be the last billionaire we eat.
I'm down with eating him last, but as long as he is one of them, I'm not voting for him. There is no such thing as an ethical billionaire
Ok then enjoy president JD Vance or Marco Rubio I guess.
Good thing Pritzker's not the only possible choice.
If you really believe that we can just elect the total collapse of American culture away, then I think you need to do some soul searching. Learn to be resilient, nobody is coming to save us.
Oh no, I'm much more cynical than that. I vote, even though I know it's pointless.
I’m not sure that’s cynicism. It sounds more like bog-standard hypocrisy.
I can't even with you people. "Not voting" is never going to get you anything you want. Ever. You think "voting is showing my undying love for somebody!" when it's really "Which of these assholes is going to lead to a better outcome?"
If you don't think Pritzker would lead to a better outcome than Trump then you're probably too stupid to figure out the voting ballot anyway.
I vote. I vote in the primaries, and the general elections, and the special elections. That doesn't mean I'm deluded enough to believe it's actually doing anything, but obviously harm reduction is the only path we have.
Trump is just continuing the same policies that every other president has put forward. Some times the have a D next to their name and they nicer things for social issues, and then everybody forgets that they're also war criminals who are enacting a massive anti-immigrant deportation policy.
If you think Pritzger is any different, than you're probably too stupid to realize you've been voting for all of this to happen the whole time.
Bull. Shit.
Oh, so I wasn't feeding and clothing immigrants in the largest open air detention facility in the history of the country during the Biden admin? Weird, I guess that was a dream. I guess I dreamed all of the family separation and children in prisons back during the Obama admin too.
You understand how stupid this argument is... right? God I hope so.
It's not. People act like this rise in fascism came out of nowhere and I'm saying that there were signs. People didn't want to read them because it would have interrupted whatever fun weekend they were having, or whatever, but the signs were there. This has been an ongoing project for decades. It didn't start with Trump and it won't end with him either
He inherited it. Does that not change things?
Actual legitimate question. I'm not a fan of billionaires but it seems different between just being born into the family vs actually doing the exploiting yourself, add to that he seems to be at least teetering on the edge of being a class traitor.
Regardless of the possibility that Pritzker's a good 'un who somehow slipped through the net, we should still have a policy that causes existing billionaire to not be billionaires anymore, and to prevent the emergence of new billionaires.
If that were to happen, Pritzker would still be a good 'un (if he really is) but inequality would have been reduced a little.
If we don't snip off that long tail, democracy won't have a chance to recover.
In my opinion, it does not. He could choose to spend every penny he has on making life better for folks until he's as poor as the rest of us. Instead he chooses to get richer.
Yeah. Mackenzie Bezos inherited her fat stacks and she's been dropping like a stone on the wealth rankings. Inherent in the state of being a billionaire is having more money than you could ever need and not using it to help others.
Money-hoarders.
Why not?
Should we exclusively simp for candidates who don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell because they’re ideologically pure?
Nope, you should support candidates that actually care about your best interests.
So you’d vote Pritzker on a Vance/Pritzker race?
I have to. But I don't believe it will do anything. The United States is Balkanizing, and will cease to be a functional anything within the decade. Voting or not.
I don't know what that is and I choose to remain ignorant