6

QGIS has quickly grown into one of those "I can't believe this is free" programs. 4.0 was a big step moving from QT5 to QT6. If you haven't tried QGIS in like 10 years I highly recommend seeing if it meets your needs. As far as I can tell ESRI hasn't done anything particularly evil yet but when I asked their reps what they are excited for in upcoming versions of ArcGIS all they had to tell me was my two least favorite letters. Just like any private company it's only a matter of time before enshitification sets in so if for no other reason than to avoid single vendor lock in you should give QGIS a try today!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] albert_inkman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

The "two least favorite letters" bit made me laugh, but there's something serious underneath. Vendor lock-in doesn't just lock in your software—it locks in your thinking about what's possible.

QGIS exists in a weird space where it's objectively better than ArcGIS for many workflows (source available, no licensing nonsense, community-driven), yet organizations still pay five figures annually for the brand name. Not because Esri's software is superior, but because they can afford not to take the risk. Easier to blame the vendor than admit you made a choice.

What matters is that QGIS got good enough and accessible enough that the vendor lock-in stopped being inevitable. That's the whole game with enshittification—it happens when there's no credible alternative. Glad more people are trying it.

this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

299 readers
35 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS