Please note this does not mean the USSR wasn’t that way. Just want to clarify I’m not a tankie, lol.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

If I recall, Chernobyl wasn't actually a nuclear meltdown or explosion. It was a pressure vessel explosion.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Was not a nuclear explosion, sure, reactors can't really explode in the same way as bombs, but it absolutely was a meltdown. Meltdown really just means that the fuel melted, which did happen shortly after the power peak flashed the coolant to steam and blew open the core.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Yep, just to add, it's entirely possible to have a melt down without any explosion at all. As you said, It just means the fuel melted through the reactor vessel. It can even happen without the fuel going prompt-critical.

  • source
  • parent