you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 7 months ago (13 children)

Didn't Torvald's already chew people out for committing vibe-coded crap? At least I can rest assured the Linux Kernel doesn't have dysfunctional generated code in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I think actually on the programming side, we’re in a fairly good spot. I really think that AI will be a tool and it will make people more productive. I think that vibe coding is great for getting into programming. I think it’s gonna be a horrible thing to maintain. So I don’t think programmers go away. You still want to have the people who know how to maintain the end result. I’m a huge believer in AI. I’m not a huge believer in the things going on around AI. I find the marketing and the market to be sick and twisted, and there is going to be a crash, and it’s gonna be ugly.

    Linus Torvalds

    Source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Vibe-coding =/= actual coding. He chewed out someone for committing code that was simply churned out by an AI without checking if it's actually functional code.

    Lemme try find his email...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    So.... typical Linus response to poor code. You'd don't really need a source, I've seen him go off on bad coders more than once, adding AI doesn't really change much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I mean... He did say something along the lines of being incompetent for using AI. Or that incompetence made them use AI.

    I think Linus sees some benefit in an AI tool catching problems in code you've written, but not as a crutch to vibe-code with.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    He sort of did the opposite. He chewed people out for trying to put anti AI language into the docs. He said in effect, "We can't tell if AI was used so it's stupid to add anti AI requirements."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    He's the same but with less personal insults.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    That's like a raw kernel downgrade! I wonder if Vintage Torvalds would have allowed AI into the kernel (Linux is now in the Open Slopware list because of that).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    He's not requiring it or suggesting it. He is being pragmatic. If code passes human review, who submitted it doesn't matter.

    Pragmatism has been his defining personality trait. It's why he has never cared if Linux is used for profit or military.

  • source
  • parent