you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Iirc he was falsely accused/a scapegoat or something

Sidenote, this came up in my search while I was refreshing my memory

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    He wasn't falsely accused, he just claimed he was, to protect his memory for his family. There's enough evidence for me personally to convict him, starting with the notebook that had the date of the meeting with the bribers torn out. Just that one page.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 7 months ago

    Also, while I am... unsure of what to think about the whole thing, I do recall that basically, if he killed himself instead of going to jail, somehow, that ended up so that his family would still be elligible for his pension pay out, or something like that.

    Yep, ok, I'm not nuts:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._Budd_Dwyer

    Death benefits

    Since Dwyer died in office, his widow Joanne was able to collect full survivor benefits totaling more than $1.28 million (equivalent to about $3.63 million in 2025), which at the time was the largest death benefit payment ever made by the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System. If Dwyer had been sentenced, state law would have prohibited the payment of his state-provided pension benefits.[14][100] A spokesman for Dwyer suggested that he may have killed himself to preserve the pension benefits for his family, whose finances had been ruined by legal defense costs.[101]

  • source
  • parent