11

The drive has been only been powered on and used for read over the last 3+ years. CrystalDiskInfo reports it's bad but CrystalDiskMark shows decent read/write speeds. Only wrote to it in the very beginning when I dumped a lot of archives into it. Otherwise, very few actual write cycles which is making me think it's still ok to use. However, this isn't a NAS drive and is consumer-grade bought many years ago.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

It is much more important if the numbers are increasing then how high the numbers are. You can have multiple bad sectors or on SSDs Media Errors and the drive will be good for years to come.

I would recommend data hygiene in the first place. Have a working backup! And if you can afford it (can you afford to loose your data) some kind of redundancy like raid zfs or therelike.

I have as of now multiple drives at home and work in operation that have some form of error but have not changed their error values in literally years. Could i have afforded to replace the drives? Sure, but i also could have had a drive as a replacement that fails during the first resilver of the array.

this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

datahoarder

10177 readers
9 users here now

Who are we?

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.

-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS