143
'Yes, it’s real': Bombshell Epstein email appears to undercut Trump's story
(www.rawstory.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
143 points (99.3% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files
882 readers
842 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
Also, that April 7 exchange isn't on the DOJ website anymore:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01990936.pdf
Huh, I thought I'd checked them all. I was working from Jmail and not the DoJ site.
Fortunately, Jmail is its own repository and links to the DoJ data sets for reference/accountability. Try this link, it's the same email:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00908376.pdf
I'll correct mine as well. Thank you for pointing it out.
Great, thanks for pointing to the jmail one instead 👍
I would have done that throughout but there's a specific request on so many posts in this community to add links to the actual corpus that I stayed with EFTA links, instead giving the overall link to the William Riley emails at the very top for those who want Jmail since they're all visually grouped once you know the date range.
In this case linking Jmail would have saved me a step because that's what I was working from. For emails and seeing email chains in roughly chronological order, nothing beats Jmail.
But there would still have been the issue of the defunct EFTA link for anyone who wanted to see the original, so I guess it's pretty much the same either way. At least with Jmail I could easily see that there were three duplicates for that email and pick another EFTA link that pointed to the same content, which is something that disappears easily on the DoJ site: the more hits you get on DoJ, the more readily duplicates and significant patterns disappear in the noise.