16
submitted 2 days ago by Hawkaw@lemmy.ml to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

Lets not forget that there is a lot of traffic. Why Redlib and lemmy join forces?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

I think the whole reason people use Lemmy is because it isn't Reddit and isn't subject to reddits rules and manipulations as well as reddits really toxic userbase and astroturfing. Whilst I'm sure this technically could be done, albeit in a very hacky way, the reason as to why is hard to find.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

astroturfing

both the epsteing files and gishlaine maxwell case files have proven this to be a dramatic understatement.

they literally identified reddit as a high value platform and used words like "narrative management" and "suppression protocols" to describe their efforts.

astroturfing

i mean that's what it's there for? always has been

like, how else do you think companies on the internet make money? by manipulating public opinion

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

it's one thing to convince you to buy something and it's an entirely different thing to condition to you accept that genocides are necessary sometimes; vote against your own interests or else the other team will win; propagandize you against foreign political enemies; distract you from global rings of oligarchical pedofiles who torture, rape, kill and eat children for funsies; and many other things.

it’s one thing to convince you to buy something and it’s an entirely different thing to condition to you accept that genocides are necessary sometimes; vote against your own interests or else the other team will win; propagandize you against foreign political enemies; distract you from global rings of oligarchical pedofiles who torture, rape, kill and eat children for funsies; and many other things.

like, i see what you mean but i'm afraid that modern society doesn't see it that way. "moral relativism" (a.k.a. post-structuralism) states that there is no absolute truth, neither is there an absolute set of ethics; and as a consequence, it must be possible to negotiate these ethics on the "free market of ideas", a.k.a the internet where big influencer institutions pay to sway your opinion. It's all just a market game: Buy and sell opinions, and see which ones perform best as a consequence.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

my previous comments is evidence enough that modern society's views are skewed through a lenses shaped by those big influencers enough that there's no such thing as a free market; only a capture one.

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

As meta almost-showed, the reason "why" is to keep those platforms from interacting with federated-services on their own terms - they can't control the interaction if no one uses their implimentation.

Leave it to them, and its embrace-extend-extinguish all the way down. Reddit and the rest have used AI-training as an excuse to lock-down and claim owner-ship of user-generated content. Letting them keep users from using our own content how we please would be a mistake.

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
16 points (90.0% liked)

Lemmy

14488 readers
3 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS