53
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by AnEye@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

[All these points apply to sex and to gender, so for ease of reading, I'll just discuss gender]

Gender-exclusive groups are common in many societies, such as men-only and women-only social clubs and casual activity groups like a men's bowling group or a women's reading circle.

Sometimes this is de-facto, but sometimes this is enforced by rules or expectations, treating the club as a safe space for airing issues people have with other genders, or avoiding perceived problems with other genders.


I came across this old comment in a garbage subreddit by accident when researching. The topic is Men's Sheds:

"Here's the thing. No reasonable person has an issue with women having their own women's activity groups. The annoying part is that whenever men try to do something similar, that's a problem. Women either want them banished or demand entry, EVERY time."

I think their claim is nonsense, grossly exaggerated at best. I also know of many counterexamples of men trying to get into women-only groups (as an extreme case, the Ladies Lounge of the Mona art gallery in Australia was taken to court for sex discrimination, with the creator claiming they would circumvent the ruling by installing a toilet). But nonetheless, I can understand why they feel this way, patriarchal social relations change how most people see men-exclusive spaces vs. women-exclusive spaces.

But my response to their claim is that, I am reasonable and I do have an issue with any group setting up places which discriminate based on gender. These safe places can form as a legitimate rudimentary form of protection, yes, but they maintain and often even promote sexism, and should all be challenged and turned into something better which serves the same purpose.

Of course, I'm limited by my own experiences and perspective, so I'd love to hear your opinions on the topic.


Bonus video: "Why Do Conservative Shows All Look the Same? | Renegade Cut" - a discussion about fake man-caves and sexism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bampop@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Gender exclusive groups are OK when there is a legitimate reason.

What is a legitimate reason though? Consider...

  1. men do not face the problem of being put in uncomfortable situations by women almost anywhere they go, so they have less topics or activities where they feel like they need a men’s only group. For most topics/activities men can go to a mixed-gender group and have the same experience as they would in a male-only group. Women can’t.

You seem to be saying that a legitimate reason would be a need to escape from people hitting on you or the equivalent. How about if you just want to hang out with people of your own gender? Is that not OK? Men do not have the "same experience" in mixed gender groups. Socializing in a single gender group is different from in a mixed gender group and both are important. You are dismissing the need for men to socialize among themselves on the basis that they might make an important decision that should have included people outside that group. Now I understand that this has historically been (and in some cases continues to be) an issue with work-based men's-only clubs/outings etc, and it should be addressed in that context. But it's not a valid reason to reject the existence of male only groups or spaces in their entirety, is it?

Case in point: I sing in a male voice choir. I enjoy it not just on a musical level, but also for the fact that it is a male space. It's not about hating women, or having prejudices about women. It's not actually about women at all, which is kind of my point. I have enough women in my life, what I need is to be around men sometimes. Nor is it about “we want to address a typical male problem” either, unless you consider difficulty with socializing to be a typical male problem, which, yeah, arguably it is in some cases. But guys just like doing things with guys sometimes. It's a different dynamic and it's good for us.

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

I would enjoy some male-only spaces. I used to play an MMO game and we all got on great in our guild, right up until a woman joined. Suddenly the banter started having edges to it, people were putting eachother down to try and gain status to/for the woman.

Not in any way her fault, she wasnt playing favourites or flirting or teasing anyone, she was just playing the game like everyone else, but the vibes starting turning.i didnt enjoy that.

[-] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I'm not gonna have an opinion, but I'd like to say that it sounds harsh to exclude someone based on other people being weird, no?

I don't know if you need a male-only space or a normal-person space (probably the latter).

That being said, I could maybe see how people may not want to make certain jokes in front of certain people, but if youre just having fun and youre not racist or something um idk

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

It is harsh, but its incredibly similar to the OP issue. Just in my day-dreamed space it would be women getting excluded because some men cant behave, rather than men being excluded because some men cant behave.

[-] Waldelfe@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

I'm not talking about friend groups, just groups that are open to the public. Friend groups are OK in whatever constellation you wish.

Your choir has a good reason to be men only, since that creates a certain sound.

It gets tricky when the point of the group or club is something not related to gender. I don't think an all-female board game club that is open to the public but only lets women join would be OK. Personally I think you can have your meetings for only people of your gender when you organize them only for yourself. But as soon as you do something publicly, you don't get to say "everybody can come except group X" without a good reason.

That goes for men and women, I'm also not a fan of "xy only for girls" clubs without a good reason.

[-] bampop@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Your choir has a good reason to be men only, since that creates a certain sound.

That's true. Which is why I pointed out that my reasons for joining the choir are not just about the sound. I want a male space, and I don't think I'm wrong to want that.

I don’t think an all-female board game club that is open to the public but only lets women join would be OK.

Personally I don't see what's wrong with an all female board game club, especially if it's the kind of board games that tend to mostly attract male players. It may encourage female participation where they would otherwise feel uncomfortable, and male players would probably have their own club anyway in that case. But then in the absence of a thriving all female club, an all male board game club would be a problematic thing, since it would specifically exclude a female minority. Context matters and it's important to be inclusive, but inclusivity doesn't always mean putting everyone in a single group.

But as soon as you do something publicly, you don’t get to say “everybody can come except group X” without a good reason.

OK, but what's a good reason? We often have groups for limited age ranges, for usually good reasons. You've mentioned some good reasons why men should be excluded from some women's groups. So it's not like nobody ever gets excluded from anything. And while men may have less compelling reasons to exclude women, in general single sex groups are a valuable social thing for both men and women. One of the reasons you don't see many strictly single gender clubs is because there are de facto single gender clubs which don't need to apply a rule. People socialize in a single gender category without having to formally exclude anyone. Which is fine, and avoids unnecessary polemics.

I'm just saying that we should recognize the value in this. It's a shame that male only spaces tend to be associated with patriarchy or toxic masculinity, when they also fulfill a real social need.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
53 points (78.5% liked)

Asklemmy

52923 readers
310 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS