Greentext

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Even 2016 and Eternal have pretty moderate requirements for their fidelity.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Arguably, 2016 and Eternal prove it much better than the original - people nowadays are way too spoilt to really appreciate those early 3D graphics, and IMO early 3D graphics aged much worse than pixel art.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I don't think anyone disagrees about early 3d aging poorly. But I wouldn't even call OG Doom fully 3d on account of everything besides walls and floors being sprites. Sprites are just pixels, and no vertices mean no 3d.

parent

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Also came here to say Doom. But can it (a potato) run Doom? Even if not, someone almost certainly will have tried and partially succeeded.

ps: And no other game listed in this topic can claim this