you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'd also argue that however the movie did after the fact, turning down roles you don't understand is probably the smarter option. Maybe those other movies would have also flopped if they had Connery in those roles.

Like I can't picture him doing a good Gandalf. It wouldn't be Gandalf, it would be Sean Connery in a wizard outfit. I can't think of any roles where Connery played someone who wasn't Sean Connery. He brought a lot of charisma to his roles but not a ton of range.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Jesus can you actually imagine if LOTR had Sean Connery instead of Ian McKellen? Hideous prospect. No shade to Connery, he's played some of my favourite characters over the years, but christ that would have been a terrible mistake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Idk he could land "Run, you foolsh!" pretty well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I agree that he wouldn't have been right for either part, but I'm sure they still would have been very successful franchises. Also, he probably wouldn't have gotten either part (definitely not Gandalf), they were just approaching him about it. Producers on Batman (1989) were in talks with Bill Murray and Pierce Brosnan before they moved on to Michael Keaton, but it's pretty unlikely either one would have made it.

  • source
  • parent