you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 7 months ago* (7 children)

I think we put in speed bumps a few years ago due to an employee complaint about speeding. I hate whoever suggested that. Not because people weren't speeding/ riding tails, but now half the people drive 10 MPH going over 20 MPH speed bumps.

In reality we've had a lot of good things due to suggestions over the years.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Speed bumps now are designed to make SUVs do 20. I don't have an SUV, I can't do 20 over them!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Meanwhile in my jeep, "what speedbumps?"

    It's almost as if speedbumps are stupid. If they really wanted to address speeding traffic calming designs would have done it better and been prettier to look at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    You're right. We should replace them with an automatic speed camera hooked up to automatic machine guns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    Seriously though, lane narrowing is more effective at speed reduction and traffic calming than speed bumps. Both, even, are better for particularly stubborn stretches of road.

    This does a much better job at reducing car speeds, and it is also vehicle size agnostic. People on SUVs feel far more threatened by narrowing lanes and will absolutely slow down. While they will plow through a speed bump because they can't feel them with their emotional support tank's suspension.

  • source
  • parent