527

In case congress has a change of heart and wants to hold Bondi, Patel, Blanche in contempt of congress for violating the EFTA.

Example: EFTA02440040

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 68 points 5 days ago

Why is the sender of this email censored? They sure don't sound like a victim.

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 118 points 5 days ago
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Jesus, this cartoon is a gut punch.

[-] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago

can i get a source for this image?

[-] Zombie@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago

This is the creator but I don't see any comics newer than 2019 on her site

https://www.cathywilcox.com.au/cartoons

[-] kingofras@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago

I agree, they sure ███ sound like a victim to me either.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 4 days ago

First time? The files are absolutely chock full of this stuff. Including one email that said something along the lines of "I had a nice time with your little girls, they were very naughty".

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm not familiar with everything at the federal level, but I fullfill a lot of Open Records in my state (Texas), and it's illegal to release certain private information about living people in an open records request. Things like social security numbers, DL#s etc, and email addresses are specifically prohibited from release.

Lots of my responses look similar to this if the person's identity in the header is just the email address.

For instance, if the header says John Doe johndoe@domain.com the redaction would black out the email address and leave the name. But if Outlook doesn't have the name saved in the header it would black out everything.

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Interesting point. I hadn't thought about that. We can all say he's implicated in sex trafficking, who cares? But due process for all, or due process for none, can't go doxxing people.

However, that being said. There's a small black or above, and a long one below. They can't both be the same email address. Could be a different similar situation as you described, but I bet there's a plain name in there somewhere.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Sometimes Outlook will list an email address in the proper name field in the header too.

For instance their email address may be "suspectedpedophile26@maga.com" and the header will sometimes say:

suspectedpedohile26@maga.comsuspectedpedophile26@maga.com

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago

You're looking at it from the wrong perspective

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
527 points (99.6% liked)

The Epstein Files

759 readers
671 users here now

We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.

Our Rules

(Subject to Change)

Our Justice System

This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS