-3
The world is more equal than you think
(economist.com)
Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.
The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.
Not if you're talking about ubiquitous running water... (in the 1930s to 50s, only 70% of urban homes had indoor plumbing, while a scant 20% of rural ones, where about half the population lived, did.)
Again, this has nothing to do with the world.
Okay and the revocation of aid now is not going to stop their development. No idea what you're trying to say.
No, literally for most of the world, life has gotten better. That's the entire point.
If they are impressively ignorant, sure. If you are a middle class person, hell, even poor, in the first world, would you swap places with a random Indian or Chinese person? If you have any understanding of those countries, the answer would be a hard no.
Ok so I know indians who have lives as nice as mine or better and are in my field and you are the one who said many of these gains were in india and china. So you are saying for most of the world but for much of the world they did not see these awesome gains talked about. As for aid im saying that means what we have seen might effectively have stopped and there are many places that could still be doing better. silent generation and greates generation in a city had running water and electricity for most of their lives. Yeah you could point to very rural greatest or it not being available when they were very young but overall its a constant improvement track. The obscenely rich getting massively more rich while first world middle class goes lower and heck even the big gains with first world success stories like china and india are stagnating. Again the point to small gain in dollar terms in places making a massive difference in quality of life while the overall wealth gap goes way lopsided is better than the small bit not happening but way worse than a well run world would be at with a more equitable total way of living.