391
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wampus@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 hours ago

I don’t see why altruism can’t be a core motive for this move in addition to the strategic value. They are people, after all, who surely suffer as we do in the face of murdered Palestinian children.

Because it's about as authentic a reason for China, as "Freeing Ukraine from Nazi's" is for Russia.

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

So your argument is that nothing that China does is good because China bad? Not a lot of room for nuance in that worldview.

[-] wampus@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 hour ago

No, my basic argument is that it's a 'good' thing generally for people in that area, but that it's not done for their benefit.

Read the linked article. They aren't selling the ban in any way as a humanitarian thing. It's a 'risk' thing to do with the instability in the area, and (quite likely) the potential for the USA's connections to Israel to disrupt any potential Chinese investment in the region.

All the attempts to make this sound like some humanitarian / progressive move on the part of china is bullshit injected by apologists in this thread. It's not in the article, nor has China really made any big overtures related to human rights. And given the Uyghur situation, and the state of human rights in China, it's pretty clear that they aren't that bothered with that stuff.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
391 points (99.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

3926 readers
1640 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS