375
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Shadow@lemmy.ca to c/main@lemmy.ca

With the recent willingness of the US Government to pressure its tech agencies into revealing user data without a proper judicial warrant, we've decided it's overdue for us migrate away from Cloudflare.

We'll be transitioning our sites over to https://deflect.ca/ over the next week or so, starting with pixelfed first before doing lemmy and piefed.

I hope to be able to do this without any noticeable downtime, but it is a major config change that will require some backend changes as well. I'll make an announcement before/after and you can always check https://status.fedecan.ca/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hazematman@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

I thought that was strange to but here's what they say on their website that makes it sound like you wont be charged for DDoS or bots

How We Count unique IPs (UIP)

The total number of unique IPs is tallied based on total number of legitimate individual IP addresses at the end of the calendar month. If a reader visits your website every day from the same IP address, that will equal 1 unique visitor for that calendar month, no matter how often they visit your website.

Unique is fair

Other providers might charge you based on website hits, website visits, megabytes of bandwidth, services offered and many other metrics. Some providers charge premiums during attacks. We opt for fair, consistent and predictable low-cost pricing that serves our clients fairly. Malicious bots or traffic generated during an attack are not something that you will pay for either, as these IPs will not be counted in your monthly pricing.

[-] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

This seems sensible, but does have some edges...

Like, if I use my phone at home, and out and about on cell, and at work, and at my in-laws, and at the library, then that's at least 5 "users" from one user as I change IPs.

And if I'm on Tor, who knows how many users I count as, but definitely a lot more than 1.

So I get what they're trying to do... but I don't think it'll work out fairly...

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

And if I'm behind NAT everyone who is behind it counts as one.

[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

On the other hand with cgnat deployments being common on mobile devices and lower end isps, they would end up underreporting on those users.

Overall it does seem tricky. Billing per legit request or mbit would make more sense to me.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
375 points (99.7% liked)

Lemmy.ca's Main Community

4013 readers
36 users here now


Welcome to the lemmy.ca/c/main community!

All new users on lemmy.ca are automatically subscribed to this community, so this is the place to read announcements, make suggestions, and chat about the goings-on of lemmy.ca.

For support requests specific to lemmy.ca, you can use !lemmy_ca_support@lemmy.ca.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS