10
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ashx64@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't really mind. 90hz is my sweet spot. It feels smooth enough and I'm not unnecessarily taxing my hardware for comparatively little improvements.

The only valid complaint I see is that 120hz is a little more versatile because it divisible by 24 and 30, while 90hz is only divisible by 30. So not as good for content that runs at 24fps. But even then, I still don't mind, I don't notice any presentation issues.

[-] Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

unnecessarily taxing my hardware

What?

[-] WereCat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I think he meant that the Apple tax is higher for the HW if it had higher refresh rate

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
10 points (91.7% liked)

Apple

20144 readers
96 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS