42
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by RegularJoe@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 days ago

But an oily dark roast on good beans will taste almost identical to an oily dark roast on shitty beans.

Ultimately though, we're just disagreeing on a simple linear ordering because a simple linear ordering is inadequate to describe it.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Dark roast is what you do to make poor beans drinkable. Good beans are ruined with dark roasts.

I respectfully disagree and stand by my linear progression. My best guess is that you haven't had good beans and a light roast, so you may not even be aware.

[-] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 days ago

You're not making any sense.

Good beans are ruined with dark roasts.

That's my point, you're making from me, before your patronizing bullshit. I know coffee you fuckwit. And I know that a bad roast can render the bean quality irrelevant, therefore it's more significant than bean quality. And it illustrates that the a linear progression of importance doesn't make a lot of sense.

But just carry on assuming nobody else knows anything and they're just confused, it'll probably make you happier.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ever consider decaf?

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
42 points (87.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

24999 readers
846 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS