78
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by lurker_supreme@hexbear.net to c/art@hexbear.net

But why? I was reading a fairly vacuous art history book and they drop all this knowledge and then do 0 analysis of it. Feels like they're saying "teehee, ain't it so quirky?" Their best guess was to counter Socialist Realism and to promote the US as an art powerhouse, a vision of artistic freedom!!! Is that the materialist interpretation?

E: Thanks for all the thoughtful responses. Genuinely. When I write that it sounds corporate, but I mean it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gabriel Rockhill addresses this somewhat, if I recall correctly, but there are also books on this like Who Paid The Piper? and The Mighty Wurlitzer.

Sorry to just drop titles on you and run like I'm doing here. I'm tired.

[-] lurker_supreme@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

Thank you for sharing these titles meow-hug

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

art

22943 readers
43 users here now

A community for sharing and discussing art in general.

If you are unsure if a piece of media is on theme for this community, you can make a post asking if it fits. Discussion posts are encouraged, and particularly interesting topics will get pinned periodically.

No links to a store page or advertising. Links to bandcamps, soundclouds, playlists, etc are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS