this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
188 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
255 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (11 children)

"If we don't let the oppressors roam freely, they might try to oppress you" is not something I expected to read from the EFF today. But well, here we are.

It has been standard internet behavior that if a platform does not have the proper response to abuse complaints, you move up a layer higher until you find someone that is receptive to it. This has been standard operating procedure for more or less for the entirety of the current millennium, and this article has done absolutely zero work to provide a good reason it should be anything otherwise, other than bringing up generic "free speech" stuff.

You should not get a path out of that process because one layer immediately above the problematic entity is actively choosing to disregard abuse complaints. You simply move up to the next step. And this process simply must keep existing, as doing anything otherwise is to allow people to pull off all kinds of bad things; scams, spam, illegal activity and far more.

And if you abolish the non-legal form of that process? Well, there's still a legal process - and as soon as someone that wants to censor minorities gets control over the legal process, they will simply change the rules in their favor, as has happened countless times in the past.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's because you and every other idiot zoomer has been brainwashed into thinking protecting free speech is racist or something. If you don't understand why megacorps and the government shouldn't be able to censor you then you shouldn't be able to use the Internet at all.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Hey, person whose been on the internet since doing so involved torturing a modem here. You're not a wizened authority and people who believe differently than you aren't brainwashed children. Fuck the Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

And who is wizened enough to censor the internet? You? AT&T? Free speech is a fundamental human right that the Nazis didn't respect at all. If you want to act like them go on ahead, but don't be upset if I call you brainwashed too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

been on the internet since doing so involved torturing a modem

Oh no, the memories, they're coming back... those awful screams!... trriitwoo..trzsh-psh-bzrdrgh-shhhh... 😱

(and we always kept ATM1 to hear it all in case it failed 🤣)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Reminder to be nice on our instance

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Free speech absolutism is even more of a brain dead idea.

load more comments (7 replies)