317
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 4 points 3 days ago

Let’s Encrypt is a trusted, established alternative, it could replace Microsoft for long-lived software certificates.

Uh, no it could not.

First of all, the whole point of signing software is to ensure it comes from a reputable source. Let’s Encrypt signs certificates with an automated process that does no verification whatsoever of the identity of the person asking for a certificate. It would make the whole process completely pointless.

Second, Let’s Encrypt has stated themselves over a decade ago that they have no intention of doing this because it would render the whole system pointless.

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The point of signing software is to ensure the software was not tampered from the publisher. Linux package managers solve this by comparing a gpg key from the publisher with the software's. There is no need for a corporate giant to "vet" software.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

I guess, the point was there's nothing doing that in windows, and you will have to check manually or use an expensive M$ certificate

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
317 points (99.4% liked)

Programming

25285 readers
307 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS